« October 2012 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
and now, Benton?
Chamish
Constitutional
Economy, what's left of
General politics
general rant/rave
Kennewick Illegal
Legal actions
Richland illegal
Seattle illegal
Second-Amendment
WA Illegal
WA media anti 2A bias
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Dave's 2A Blog
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
Voting machine fraud-deliberate

Happens every year, huh?

http://myfox8.com/2012/10/23/guilford-county-voters-say-they-voted-for-the-wrong-candidate/ 

===============

A    Less than a minute ago
Your comment is awaiting moderation
 
The BOE are LYING. Or the people who trained them on the machines LIED to BOE.

Eitehr way, someone is LYING. Listen to an engineer who can design that machine.'

There is absolutely NOTHING to "calibrate" inside a voting machine. A voting machine (computer) is an analogy to a box with black balls and white balls, each person picks a colored ball (I can hear the jokes now..) and drops it in the hole in the ballot box.

The total of each of white and black balls is ADDED then stored.

There is NOTHING to calibrate in counting integer numbers of balls in a hole, mouse clicks or in this case, I assume, touch pad or pen-on-screen inputs.

There is NOTHING in the Visual Basic code behind that counting of inputs thats calibrated. [This app is so simple it could be handled by MACHINE CODE, its an ADDER]
 
The computer behind it can probably count to several trillion, so theres no chance of inaccurate count with tens of thousands of Voters.

Second lie, this one CLEARLY told by BOE:

"Guilford County Board of Elections Director George Gilbert says the problem arises every election. It can be resolved after the machine is re-calibrated by poll workers."

That proves the machine is not only defective, or been tampered with, but they KNOW it is, as they admit "every year"

If its simply a matter of "calibration" then do it EACH DAY.

The basic lie behind this is that computers make mistakes. They do not, especially such simple ones.

The basic misconception (or another lie) is what "calibration" is. That is a correction applied to a system, circuit etc that has a variance in its operation large enough to affect the output of the system. An oven has a thermostat that must be calibrated because the oven has a huge heater and is insulated but still loses a great deal of heat, and the heating element cannot control itself, so the result is a thermostat is required to maintain oven setpoint. That thermostat (in the good old days) was calibrated especially if the oven heat could affect the thermostats setpoint. Nowadays with advanced sensors and electronics, calibrations are all but a thing of the past.

Calibration is for ANALOG systems, NOT DIGITAL COMPUTERS. A voting machine is a DIGITAL system, not an analog where the input (touch pen here to vote) is affected in any way by the stored cumulative count.


ALess than a minute ago
An error has occurred, please try again later (400006)
 
PS, especially in a digital system (which is a JOKE to even discuss calibration as 1's and 0's do not have calibration) if there was something in the machine that required calibration, soemone put it there deliberately to tamper with the outcome.

This machine does nothing except count inputs (votes) for maybe 100 possible inputs (Offices or ballot initiatives times the number of Candidates or Yes or No votes) and store the results, then later send that data out somewhere.

A scientific CALCULATOR could do that if it had a fancy touch screen input.

If there is (and its pointless) to have something "calibrated" in a machine that needs no calibration, then it is unforgivable, and should land someone in PRISON, to design it such that the calibration changes that much in a system thats used inside where its nice dry, warm, no physical damage or vibration (used under ideal conditions). It was either deliberate, or a matter of gross incompetence.

In either of those cases, it is further unforgiveable to not put the design through testing in the 100s of millions of votes.

 


Posted by Dave at 9:21 AM PDT

View Latest Entries