The WA Legislature, in all their illiteracy, are pushing a "vote often" bill which specifically provides for voting twice, and inventing some connection with the "Help America Vote Act" (PL 107-252) that does not exist with regards to reasons for not being registered.

Read SB5124 at:

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5124&year=2011 

READ THE BILL. DONT take ANYONES word for whats in it, especially in a place like WA State where illiteracy is RAMPANT.

Then look at PL 107-252 at:

http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt

 Here are my notes as a guide:

--------------

in re 5124/2011:

* Sect. 34 (2), p 24 should read "and under the control of the Auditor..."

*in re "voting center", line 8, p. 27 "employer card" is troubling, whats that got to do with a State run voting system? Since when is an employer a LEGAL AUTHORITY? This may allow illegals to vote.

*Sect 43, line 22, should indicate under whose control. Too vague. Secure with the County/State or secure in a box at the nearest auto parts store?

*Sect 47, p. 35, lines 11-14, vague, unenforceable, permits fraud. Who determines, and by what standard is determined that "handwriting is the same?" Someone with handwriting analysis experise or someone OPINION? Not valid. If Voter cannot figure out what his OWN NAME is and how to SIGN IT, he is incompetent. Too much room for fraud here.
 
Sec. 1, p.3, lines 7 and 8 - misleading, false. PL 107-252 does not establish 'reasons why not registered' as falsely indicated in these lines. It refers to simply 'not being registered' (Title III Sec. 302 at http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt ) The Federal Code only related to a missing entry on the voter rolls, NOT ELIGIBILITY FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE TWICE as stated in WA SB5124

"12 (b) There is an indication in the ((poll book that the voter has (13) requested an absentee ballot, but the voter wishes to vote at the (14) polling place)) voter registration system that the voter has already (15) voted in that primary, special election, or general election, but  the (16) voter wishes to vote again;

& read Sec 36, p 27 (12), provides for check against voting twice but what WHEN that CHECK DOESNT HAPPEN???? Is there any MEANINGFUL PENALTY against the resulting VOTE FRAUD?? It wont happen in THIS STATE!!!!

THE FEDERAL LAW SAYS NOTHING ABOUT VOTING TWICE. FEDERAL LAW SIMPLY ESTABLISHES TO VERIFY REGISTRATION.  SOMEONE IS FABRICATING THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Vote early, VOTE OFTEN????????

This bill is is simple, it provides for Mexican voting, undocumented, vote twice, just conveniently FORGET to remove their vote after its cast.. Allow them to vote twice, or be unable to produce ID, vote anyway and promise to catch it later (which wont happen, Sect 36, p. 27 lines 9-12).

Posted by Dave at 11:08 AM PST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Jut in- final response from the WSBA refusing to do anything about the clearly unlawful acts of Lampson and the City of REICHland in re their ILLEGAL, PREEMPTED AND REPEALED City Ordinance banning weapons in Amon Park.

 Not that I expected a CABAL to do anything but cover its own ass.  Theyre all in it together, including the PRO 2A ATTORNEYS in WA State WHO LIED THROUGH THEIR TEETH TO ME. The So called NRA Attorneys who refused to take action. The so called "Washington State Gun Lawyer" who lied to me, stating he would take this on, then later refused to when he found out I wanted to take action with TEETH in it.

 The Bar has covered up Lampsons illegal and improper (under the Court Rules) actions in aiding his Client (Richland) in making the ILLEGAL, PREEMPTED and REPEALED Ordinance.

He, as Respondant, did not respond to the (charges, accusation, allegation, use whichever word is appropriate) that I made, rather, employed red herring to evade them, by simple citing the history of the matter and ignoring the pointed, documented allegations I made with clear references to the Courts Rules which hold those actions as improper.

Is it not unconscionable for an Attorney to aid his Client in doing something clearly FORBIDDEN by law?

 Apparently in WA it isn't.

  Ive scanned and posted all the WSBA documents on the front page here:

http://second-amendment.tripod.com

for your response of "did you expect anything else"

To wit I reply as Ecclesiastes wrote:

"Don't be surpised when one is corrupt, and the one above him helps cover it up."

I'm not...

Posted by Dave at 2:50 PM PDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

There are at least two witnesses who will allege TREASON under RCW 9.. Im # 1.

 ---------------

David R Campbell
PO 1336
Richland WA 99352-1336

Sen. Jeanne Welles
219 John A. Cherberg Building
PO Box 40436
Olympia, WA 98504-0436

Rep. Ross Hunter
330 John L. O'Brien Building
PO Box 40600
Olympia, WA 98504-0600

Sen. Adam Kline
223 John A. Cherberg Building
PO Box 40437
Olympia, WA 98504-0437

Washington Ceasefire
Ralph Fascitelli
PO 20216
Seattle WA 98102


 In Re. the Seattle Times article on your proposed gun ban

  Hello Subversives!

  The amount of FALSE information you all have fed to the Seattle Paper is staggering, and we are communicating with the paper and the People to expose it. Your goal is an attempt to institute the assault rifle ban.

  In the mean time, this is the crux of the matter. The Seattle Times newspaper quotes Jeanne Welles as making some FALSE statements:

"What we're trying to get at is there's no place to have sales of military assault rifles or weapons in this state,"

 There ARE NO such weapons sold in the State now, nor have there been. This is a DELIBERATELY false statement.

    "She also said she doesn't believe such a ban would violate the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms."

  There is NO "Right to Bear Arms" granted by the Constitution.

  Both US AND WA Constitutions FORBID you to infringe on that right.

 Since it is clear you all are operating from deliberately false information, there is no point in correcting you, except to say to you all:

  In a time when our Nation is at WAR with radical Islam and you are acting
to aid and abet them by attempting to disarm Citizens from having weapons that can defeat Terrorists, decide whether you wish to be put on trial for SUBVERSION or TREASON.

 You'd better look up the penalties in RCW for those CRIMES before deciding.

  The People will NOT tolerate lawmaking to push Washington Ceasefire’s Leftist, subversive, utopian agenda, especially when such laws are a directly contrary to both Constitutions.

  Here are some talking points:

  In Richland  where people own guns, there is little crime except the illegal drug dealing Mexicans you Legislators have allowed to come here.

  It’s interesting that the type of crime you’re crusading against doesn’t happen here. It only happens in Cities that share your Leftist Agenda.

  You must want crime. We won’t tolerate it here.


                Most Sincerely


                                  David R Campbell



CC.via Email to Klippert, Delvin, Van De Wege

------------

(1) Treason against the people of the state consists in --

     (a) Levying war against the people of the state, or

     (b) Adhering to its enemies, or

     (c) Giving them aid and comfort.

     (2) Treason is a class A felony and punishable by death.

     (3) No person shall be convicted for treason unless upon the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or by confession in open court.

[2003 c 53 § 46; 1909 c 249 § 65; RRS § 2317.]

 http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.82

===============

(1) "Organization" means an organization, corporation, company, partnership, association, trust, foundation, fund, club, society, committee, political party, or any group of persons, whether or not incorporated, permanently or temporarily associated together for joint action or advancement of views on any subject or subjects.

     (2) "Subversive organization" means any organization which engages in or advocates, abets, advises, or teaches, or a purpose of which is to engage in or advocate, abet, advise, or teach activities intended to overthrow, destroy or alter, or to assist in the overthrow, destruction or alteration of, the constitutional form of the government of the United States, or of the state of Washington, or of any political subdivision of either of them, by revolution, force or violence.

     (3) "Foreign subversive organization" means any organization directed, dominated or controlled directly or indirectly by a foreign government which engages in or advocates, abets, advises, or teaches, or a purpose of which is to engage in or to advocate, abet, advise, or teach, activities intended to overthrow, destroy or alter, or to assist in the overthrow, destruction or alteration of the constitutional form of the government of the United States, or of the state of Washington, or of any political subdivision of either of them, and to establish in place thereof any form of government the direction and control of which is to be vested in, or exercised by or under, the domination or control of any foreign government, organization, or individual.

     (4) "Foreign government" means the government of any country or nation other than the government of the United States of America or of one of the states thereof.

     (5) "Subversive person" means any person who commits, attempts to commit, or aids in the commission, or advocates, abets, advises or teaches by any means any person to commit, attempt to commit, or aid in the commission of any act intended to overthrow, destroy or alter, or to assist in the overthrow, destruction or alteration of, the constitutional form of the government of the United States, or of the state of Washington, or any political subdivision of either of them by revolution, force, or violence; or who with knowledge that the organization is an organization as described in subsections (2) and (3) hereof, becomes or remains a member of a subversive organization or a foreign subversive organization.

[1953 c 142 § 1; 1951 c 254 § 1.]

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.81.010

 Attacks such as this on both Constitutions will not be tolerated.

Posted by Dave at 12:50 PM PST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Some Subversives in the WA Legislature and an anti Freedom subversive group called "Washington Ceasefire" want to restore the assault weapon ban. They are either lying in the process, or the Times cant report a story straight. I think its the former: 

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2010527541_gunban17m.html 

---------------------- My response to the Seattle reporter:

Molly, david Campbell writing from Richland WA. The well meaning Legislators, in this instance, are giving you very detailed FALSE information:

1.) " require current owners to pass background checks."

They already have, or they would not have the firearms in the first place. Bob M. can tell you about that as an expert.

2.) "Police believe a .223-caliber semi-automatic rifle was used then."

Believe? So they are proposing legislation against a category of firearm, but dont know if one was used in said incident?

3.) "The ban would cover semiautomatics designed for military use that are capable of rapid-fire and can hold more than 10 rounds."

There IS NO SUCH THING and/or a false statement, since:

a.). The 223 presumably in question can hold one, 5, 10, 20, 30, 100 rounds. Semiautomatics are not designed for military use, neither are military weapons sold to the Public. There is no such thing as a "semiautomatic designed for military use." For example, the AR-15 223 is NOT a military weapon, the M-16 version is. The M-16 is different mainly in that it can fire as a machine gun.

b.) "rapid fire" is not defined. The correct term is "automatic fire." which is the term that applies to Military style weapons. "Rapid fire" refers to the Individual using the firearm, not the firearm itself.

4.) ""If they're used in the army, used in the war — that's what this ban is about," said Ralph Fascitelli, the board president of Washington Ceasefire."

false and misleading statement, such weapons ARE NOT available nor sold to the Public. The ban is NOT about these weapons, its an attempt to reinstitute the "assault rifle" ban.
ALso, there is no such thing as an "assault rifle" (223 as an example).

5.) ""What we're trying to get at is there's no place to have sales of military assault rifles or weapons in this state," she said."

False statement, there are NO such sales now. Ask Bob!

6.) "She also said she doesn't believe such a ban would violate the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms."

FALSE STATEMENT. Right to Bear Arms does not come from the Constitution. The Constitution FORBIDS Government from preventing Citizens from owning firearms, it DOES NOT "allow" people to do so.

The Constitutions (both US and WA) are limitations on Government activities, they DO NOT give People "permission or rights" to do anything.

Heres a link to the WA State Constitution, read Article 1 section 24 and tell me where it gives "permission" for a Citizen to do anything.

Posted by Dave at 4:46 PM PST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink