Problems, and I looked like an IDIOT yesterday so heres an admission:
1.) America is based on EQUALITY. Equal Constitutional protections, and this idea of equal under the LAW. Thus, O'Immigrationlawevader cannot pick and choose who HE wants to stay, like he cannot pick and choose who to EXEMPT from HEALTH CARE. He also has no authority to pick and choose where he wants to WARMONGER (trying to go around CONgress in re Iran)
2.) BIG PROBLEM. I didnt catch it until after jumping on this bandwagon.
Read the US Constitution, point to ANY PLACE that gives the President or the un Constitutional Administration ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT POWER.
ITS
NOT
THERE
That belongs to the STATES.
Obama can NOT enforce immigration law on anyone, the Constitution does not allow it.
That means this is all a smoke screen. Realizing the Administration is also totally un Constitutional, that no such thing as "law enforcement" I.E. the Feds FBI DHHS any of that is permitted under the Constitution.
There is no such thing as a US border. ITs an Arizona, Texas, NM, CA border.
Its the STATES rights to secure it. That the laws on immigration (there should be one titled "illegal aliens" because they are NOT immigrants) are conceived at the National level does not imply control, its simply to co-ordinate among the States that the law is UNIFORM for all States.
The US Govts role is supposed to be LIMITED to more or less foreign affairs, NO permission was ever given to evolve into a massive Police State controlling the whole Nation.
This question of criminal aliens is a STATES matter.
Obama is actually evading the Constitution by enforcing laws.
Since he has no Constitutional authority to enforce immigration law, he ALSO can NOT tell Arizona that they cannot either.
What we have in this situation is a dictatorial takeover in the works, when all power is consolidated in the Executive.
This Bill is not proper, ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT need to be handed down, not this dog and pony show.
Levin?
PS and for anyone arguing that the Constitution is law, it is not, this is a sham argument invented by lawyers:
1.) The constitution is a framework to establish Congress etc to MAKE law, not laws themselves
2.) when the C. is believed to be law, and Government can modify law, and the purpose of the C is to establish and CONTROL Government, then Government can manipulate the C. to SEIZE CONTROL OF ITSELF FROM THE PEOPLE.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHATS HAPPENING IN EGYPT RIGHT NOW !!!
PSS "law enforcement" does not exist in the Founding of our Nation or States.
The RIGHT to Redress of Grievance DOES. That belongs ONLY to the People, NOT GOVERNMENT.
But, Government has STOLEN it, and used it to fabricate a big Police State. Govenment has NO right to be in Court. Government has no rights at ALL, none were ever enumerated.
This has become Statism with soldiers quartered in our homes.
