« March 2012 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
and now, Benton?
Chamish
Constitutional
Economy, what's left of
General politics
general rant/rave
Kennewick Illegal
Legal actions
Richland illegal
Seattle illegal
Second-Amendment
WA Illegal
WA media anti 2A bias
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Dave's 2A Blog
Tuesday, 6 March 2012
SCAM ALERT - PHONEY "PRO GUN" LEGISLATION _THEYRE LYING

 THEY ARE LYING. MARK MY WORDS

http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/judge-strikes-down-md-gun-law-md-congressman-reintroduces-gun-rights-bill

 

  • LIES:

    "As Judge Legg correctly ruled, the burden should be on the government to prove that an American is unfit to exercise this Constitutional right."

    What f*%&&^#$ part of SHALL NOT INFRINGE is unclear here?

    The CONSTITUTION FORBIDS INFRINGEMENT FOR ANY REASON.

    Then the lies and manuvering continue:

    "shall have the right to obtain firearms for security and to use firearms in defense"

    So then the State determines what "security" and "defense" is. Notice the CLEVER scam here, to use the word "OBTAIN"

    NO RIGHT TO USE.

    THIS IS A SHAM, PEOPLE. BEWARE. 


  • a_patriot

    Heres where this deceit goes... the anti gunners are already out to restrict firearms use to "hunting"

    Thats where this lying scam goes with the word "obtain"

    "Obtain" with the LATER restriction to USE only for HUNTING.

    The wording is "OBTAIN FOR USE"

    It does not say "USE"

    S-C-A-M- theyll throw you under the bus for "use" for ANY reason. Some States are basically that way now.

    Proof? Just watch, the anti gun crowd wont object, they know theres a SCAM afoot.

  • Part III of the scam:

    ""Authorizes persons whose rights under this Act have been violated to
    bring an action in U.S. district court against the United States, any
    state, or any person for damages, injunctive relief, and such other
    relief as the court deems appropriate.""

    So the Government will graciously ALLOW you to SUE THEM (others) AFTER they infringe on your rights and since you are Plaintiff, YOU HAVE TO PROVE they did wrong.

    AFTER they mow you down with a SWAT team for attempting to defend yourself

  • a_patriot

    PS to Part III of the scam.

    To bring an action, you must be able to show CAUSE and simply "they wouldnt let me have a gun" IS NOT CAUSE.

    WAKE UP PEOPLE

    This is ALREADY the case. IVE BEEN THERE, the G-D lawyers REFUSED to take the case.

    Remember before youre sucked into this LYING SCAM that the Bill holds "obtain for use in defense..."

    The GOvernments counter to that is that since you didnt NEED it for defense, you have NO STANDING TO SUE FOR THEM PREVENTING YOU TO POSESS IT.

    This negates the Bill and is why the anti gunners will not object, THEY KNOW IT.

    You people better get over this stupidity about "some great victory" because youre getting HOSED>

 


Posted by Dave at 5:14 PM PST

View Latest Entries