Topic: Constitutional
LTE to the Herald:
---------------------------
Comments to our US Representatives in re. S 32 (high capacity firearms magazine legislation)
"In re S.32.
Here is the US Constitution, 2nd Amendment- its PERFECTLY clear:
"...the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."
How did S./R. _________ vote on S 32?
Any part of SHALL NOT that is unclear? I dont see, in the US Constitution either:
1.) exception to that limitation that allow servants of the People to usurp the limitations we place on them
2.) limiting terms that define "arms"
3.) limiting terms that define the age of "people"
I trust S ________ has not violated her/his OATH to SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION.
Remember, the Constitution DOES NOT grant rights, it FORBIDS Senators and Reps from infringing on those rights."
Regardless of the fiction that the Legal system has created that makes the Constitution subservient to law, it is not. In fact, the WA State Constitution incorporates the US Constitution as "law of the State."
It is unforgiveable to:
1.) violate the Oath of Office in making unconstitutional laws that infringe on the Peoples rights
2.) use tragedy (Giffords, Arizona) to push a political agenda.
