Police Chief overhauls department after Native American shooting
Following the controversial fatal shooting of a Native American man, Seattle Police Chief John Diaz on Wednesday announced an overhaul of his department...
Investigators say officer Ian D. Birk, 27, shot 50-year-old John T. Williams Aug. 30. Police say Williams was armed with a knife when he was shot four times after the officer ordered him to drop the weapon. However some witnesses have said Williams, a Native American wood carver, did not appear threatening. His family has said he was deaf in one ear.
=========================
Lets sort through the LIES, ad hominems and red herrings littering THIS story (not that the PI is doing it, they are being fed a proverbial crock of crap and arent QUESTIONING it.)
1.) The WA CONSTITUTION DOES NOT allow "armed bodies of corporate men" meaning POLICE DEPARTMENTS TO HAVE GUNS
Article I, Sect 24, WA Constitition states:
"SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men."
http://www.leg.wa.gov/lawsandagencyrules/pages/constitution.aspx
police Departments as subordinates to CITY CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED WEAPONS
2.) "Police Chief overhauls department after Native American shooting"
The connundrum of colliding LEFTIST idealogies, the Police State murdering CITIZENS, vs the Leftist sponsored racism
that favors this or that group to further political power. In this case, the State favors committing TERRORISM
against Citizens (cops murdering people in the streets) because it creates more power. Only when things
become so bad thy cannot be hidden any longer, and this collision among leftist idealogies ocurrs do they
come ouf of hiding to at least phoney up a "solution"
3.) Here we go with the lies:
"Nine commanders will assume a new job to help build the community, reduce fear in the city and fight crime, Diaz said."
NONE of those are the job of LAW ENFORCEMENT. "Community building" is socialist social infiltration, Alinsky - style. "Reduce Fear" in the context of "fear as a result of a police shooting (murderr in cold blood) proves my previous point about them CREATING the fear in the first place. "Crime fighting" is for Batman and Robin, the cops job is LAW ENFORCEMENT and nothing else, red-herring-ed or not.
4.) "Authorities also said after Seattle police complete their own probe into last month's fatal shooting, they are prepared to allow two outside police agencies to conduct a "peer review.""
RED HERRING, the process should be PROSECUTION FOR MURDER. Wanna start more INNER CITY RIOTS? Keep it up...
5.) "Tim Burgess, chairman of the Public Safety committee and a former police officer, had called for an independent probe of the Williams shooting."
Red herring, EVASIVE. The WILLIAMS MURDER. They love to play semantic infiltration. Murder with a GUN IS NOT justified under WA Law against someone non threatening with a KNIFE.
Gun to a knife fight? What a crock.
6.) "Diaz said Assistant Chief Nick Metz has been promoted to deputy chief of operations and community relations, tasked with building relationships."
How about LAW ENFORCEMENT instead of "relationship building"? This is Law enforcement, NOT BANKING. This is about MURDER, not a ladies tea party.
7.) "Investigators say officer Ian D. Birk, 27, shot 50-year-old John T. Williams Aug. 30. Police say Williams was armed with a knife when he was shot four times after the officer ordered him to drop the weapon."
Murder, cold blooded, premeditated. Cops are supposed to be TRAINED to DISARM people, more than one cant use PEPPER SPRAY or STUN GUNS TO TAKE A KNIFE AWAY? No, this is DELIBERATE MURDER TO CAUSE TERROR.
FOUR TIMES? Cant shoot to WOUND? Cant shoot him in the shoulder or arm which is holding the knife? No, not when the goal is STATE SPONSORED TERRORISN.
8.) "Authorities said Williams had "a decades-long history of misdemeanors and gross misdemeanor violations." Birk, a two-year veteran, was not equipped with a Taser."
PROVING my above point that this is all a COVERUP. Willfuo, wanton, premeditated TERRORISM.
WNY NOT equipped with a Tazer? That doesnt allow them to commit VIOLENT MURDER IN THE STREETS TO INVOKE TERRORISM.
9.) "On Wednesday Diaz said the department would increase its number of Tasers; there are now about 300 available for use by the approximatley 1,250 officers in the city."
Evasive, the quetion at hand is MURDER, and "tasers" which lead to MORE violence is not the answer, its evasive to ignore STATE SPONSORED MURDER.
10.) "Diaz and other police officials said de-escalation training, in which officers are taught to tamp down a volatile situation, would be reemphasized."
Not good enough. There was a recent story of a soldier who went off psych and the military diffused the situation WITHOUT MURDERING HIM. HE HAD A GUN. They talked him down.
Whats needed is to get off their lazy asses and take MANDATORY MARTIAL ARTS TRAINING, and I dont mean some beginners course, black level in Judo for a MINIMUM requirement.
11.) Back to the LIES:
""What it really comes down to is skillful decision-making," Diaz said at a City Hall news conference. "Our job is to bring peace. Our job is to make things better.""
No, your job is LAW ENFORCEMENT. No, it doesbnt come down to a red herring term called "skillful decision making" its called NOT MURDERING PEOPLE IN THE STREETS.
12.) "but stressed accountability was his top concern."
WHEN MURDER IS IGNORED, it becomes the TOP CONCERN, not a$$ covering.
11.) ""We will make a decision and we will be held responsible. I will be held responsible," McGinn said."
WA Law fixes a PENALTY FOR KILLING WITH A GUN, SOMEONE ARMED WITH A KNIFE. Until hes prosecuted and tried for his CRIMES, this is all lies and coverup.
yes, the WA Constitution provides some immunity for Municipalities, but NOT FOR MURDER.
IMPORTANT PS:
"Crime fighting" implies STOPPING crime before it happens. There is NO legal authority in this Nation to do that. that implies TOTAL STATE CONTROL OF PEOPLES LIVES to "prevent" them from doing this or that which may or may not be illegal.
Cops have ONE job and ONE ONLY - to enforce codified LAW and do so AFTER THE FACT, after a crime or other violation HAS BEEN committed.
The man who was MURDERED had violated NO LAW.
PSS Sorry, but theres too much thats critical herre. "Preventing crime" is how COMMUNISM works. Control the citizenry, RUSSIAN STYLE.
