« February 2013 »
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
and now, Benton?
Chamish
Constitutional
Economy, what's left of
General politics
general rant/rave
Kennewick Illegal
Legal actions
Richland illegal
Seattle illegal
Second-Amendment
WA Illegal
WA media anti 2A bias
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Dave's 2A Blog
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
MAYBE SOME GOOD NEWS!!!! (...maybe)
Topic: General politics

There just MIGHT be a real Representative in --- Im about to make a false statement, keep the next phrase in mind as you read this-- "our District" --keep that phrase in mind, its false- (meaning WA State Legislative District 8).

 I'd emailed our non Representing Representatives Klippert etc and someone named "Sharon Brown" who was apparently put in place of Delvin (LET the door hit you in the ass on the way out for lying to me...)

 No loss there...

I'd written to all of them about the un Constitutional gun laws in this State and also the attempt to overturn the Subversion law.

To my utter shock and disbelief, the phone rang Sunday and Sen. Brown was on the other end. She had called to tell me that she supported the Second Amendment and she had a CCW permit.

 I have to somewhat apologise for throwing a wet blanket on her enthusiasm, but I had no choice but to tell her that her CCW permit was her participating in an UN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

CCW permits are UN CONSTITUTIONAL because they infringe on a Citizens Rignt to Keep and Bear Arms even temporarily.

NO INFRINGEMENT WHATSOEVER IS ALLOWED.

 She said something about "Constitution giving rights" and I explained that it did no such thing.

She seemed surprised by both statements. IN her defense, I was surprised that I DIDNT UNDERSTAND IT EITHER, and if you read this Blog carefully, I have Blogged that discovery process.

 I didnt get it because I didnt care. I changed that.

  I explained that the Constitution does not grant Rights, it FORBIDS the Legislature to make gun laws and the WA Legislature DID SO ANYWAY.

All of 9 RCW with the exception of subsection 290 (or is it 291, the pre emption portion) is UN CONSTITUTIONAL and that makes 290 irrelevant.

Id mentioned being interested in floating a Petition to overturn 9 RCW and she agreed it was a good time to do it, and people were really stirred up over the matter (paraphrased)

Why doesnt SHE voulenteer to enter that as a Bill?

 BUT, Im happy to say SHE CALLED!!

 

MAYBE THERES HOPE TO GET A GOOD ONE!!!!!!

 And what about the false statement about 'in our District?"

These people who supposedly "represent us" are NOT IN OUR DISTRICT, they are hidden away in Olympia (or substitute your State Capitol where your supposed Representatives hide out in) and almost entirely REPRESENT THEMSELVES.

Sorry, but showing up glad-handing at the twice yearly Constituent meeting that most people know nothing about, with 50 people IS NOT REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE.

 Theres a link on this Blogs front page:

second-amendment.tripod.com

that is to a Youtube video about 'non representing representatives'

Back in the 1700s, when the population of the States was small, it was no  problem for the People to choose a REPRESENTATIVE to REPRSENT THEM.

Its no problem to have a meeting with 1,000 people present and poll them.

The puropse of a Representative is to then take that Vote to the Legislature and cast it AS IF THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES WERE CASTING IT.

They dont do that. Proof- if so, theyd have a Constituent meeting for EVERY BILL.

Showing up twice a year does NOT constitute "representation."

They represent themselves in a twisted, sick and convoluted method of first agreeing to REPRESENT A POLITICAL PARTY CORPORATION to get on the Ballot, then promising to represent people WHO VOTED FOR THEM, and NEITHER IS DOING THEIR JOB.

Their job is to represent ALL the people AFTER the election.

Ive been saying that for several years now, someone has finally picked it up, or figured it out on their own, I dont know which, and that idea of all places ended up on ABC (American Broadcasting of Communism) a week or so ago.

With populations in the millions it is not possible for a Rep to directly poll all Citizens. It HAD BEEN possible by mail to do so, apparently no one wants to do so.

With computer technology its EASY.

Time to do it. Since its not a matter of voting for a Representative, security is not as large an issue. That last sentence was somewhat sarcastic considering the clear and admitted voting fraud in the last election(s) with rigged voting machines and Oba-Mao supporters claiming they voted more than once.

Such persons should be in JAIL.

 

 


Posted by Dave at 8:52 AM PST
Updated: Wednesday, 27 February 2013 9:15 AM PST
Monday, 25 February 2013
I TOLD YOU SO
Topic: General politics

http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20130225/chicago/louis-farrakhan-gang-members-can-serve-as-protectors

 

Whiteys Jack Booted Thug parade arent doing it, someone has to.

 I PREDICTED THIS, THAT THE GANGS WOULD BE RECRUITED.


Posted by Dave at 3:09 PM PST
Monday, 18 February 2013
tricks for network/internet security
Topic: general rant/rave

 Considering the crap the Gummit and parasites and hacks like Google are up to, never mind the attempts your neighbors and wardrivers can make to steal your ID or hack your computer, here are a couple cool tricks to help isolate yourself.

 1. The Internet is great for buying things with a credit card, problem is, the HOAX thats floated on un-suspecting shoppers about "secure shopping sites."

they are LYING to you about security. Why? Not that the site doesnt use a 'https' connection and claim to use SSL and encryption technology, they arent telling you, as they probably dont know, about the parasites that are looking in on your supposedly secure shopping session like GOOGLE.

Heres how to get rid of the bastards.

If youre doing a transaction with ABC co on line, it APPEARS that your computer is connected to ABCs and all is secure. It isnt, because its unlikely that ABC hosts the connections and websites that you do the transaction on.

 Usually, especially with small companies, they hire all that out.

Problem is, parasite bastards like Google are glomming onto your "secure connection" and can most likely RECORD the entire transaction.

Ive make many on line transactions that blocked these parasites with a simple trick to kick the Googles and ad sites off the secure connection. Its easy.

 The trick is to exclude any site from connecting to your computer that isnt absolutely required to process the transaction.

Download Netscape 9, install it. Once installed, set the system DATE on your computer back a year. Clear the cache and browser history. If the browser was open, close and re-open it.

go to the shopping website and notice pop up dialog boxes start to appear, stating that 'this sites security certificate is not valid'

 That means the security cert has a current date, that is now in the FUTURE from what date your computer thinks it is.

 You have the option to accept the cert, or hit the ESC key and dismiss it, along with dismissing the website thats trying to connect.

If you have a virus scanner that allows tracking what connections are made to a browser, you can keep track of whats connecting.

Proceed to shop and check out, and hit ESC any time theres a pop up that isnt named after the shopping site.

I did one today and blocked about 6 parasite sites, including Google

realize any of these sites have access to record your CC NUMBER if they are connected.

 Next trick to thwart the neigbors and Google-secure your Wi Fi

No, setting encryption only keeps the stupid people out, as long as they can see your router, youre a target

Forget tricks like hidden SSIDs also, all it take is an IP sniffer to find it.

to not be hacked, dont be SEEN.

that requires hiding the router so only you can see it.

To an RF CONNECTION, that is.

The router is a tiny radio station sending and receiving data. Anyone within a certain range (physically) can connect to it.

If they cannot receive the signal, they cannot connect to it.

Some routers can be modified with software to allow their transmit power to be raised and lowered (DD-WRT) but a hacker with a good high gain antenna can get around that.

Wi Fi signals are microwave, 2.4x GHz and the signals are funny, they are truly line-of-sight and bounce off metal surfaces.

Heres where we borrow some Gummit technology, as in putting sensitive communications sites underground and shielding them.

Put the router in the nearest HVAC duct. That will confine the signal to inside the furnace ducting. It will propagate through the house, but only inside the duct-work. It will exit through openings in the duct work, and in most structures, those openings point UP.

So, the signal goes up where some jackass wardriving down the street cannot receive it, theyd have to be on your houses ROOF.

Put your computers wireless adapter reasonbly near a duct outlet and voila, youre on, but no one else can see it.

 For extra security, put your computers adapter under-ground, such as in a basement, also put your wireless modem, if you use one, underground so it has to 'look'upwards to get a signal. that means someone outside has to also be elevated, or very close to the house to attempt to intercept or detect that signal

With DD-WRT, reduce router transmit power. Less power- less range.

It works for me, I walk outside on the porch with my laptop and the network disappears.

So much for Googles car wandering around collecting Street View info...


Posted by Dave at 9:40 PM PST
Updated: Monday, 18 February 2013 9:44 PM PST
Sunday, 17 February 2013
Craigslist post on WA anti gun bills
Topic: Constitutional

 http://kpr.craigslist.org/rnr/3608957695.html

 

"Well here they come---4 antigun bills from Olympia that will be heard THIS week!
HB1588--sponsored by state Representatives Jamie Pederson (D-43), Mike Hope (R-44) and thirty-six other state Representatives, would criminalize the private sale of firearms. HB 1588 is nothing more than a regulatory scheme which would create a huge burden for law-abiding citizens. It would require that anytime you sell any firearm to a family member or friend, you will have to go through a gun dealer or law enforcement agency and pay a $20 fee (tax), with no guarantee of timely processing.Additionally, while Concealed Pistol License (CPL) holders are currently exempt from having to undergo a background check when purchasing a firearm from a dealer, there is no provision in HB 1588 that extends the CPL exemption to private sales.



HB1676---sponsored by state Representative Ruth Kagi (D-32) and thirteen other state Representatives, is a so-called "child access prevention" bill which would single out the storage of firearms for criminalization under certain circumstances.

We already have a gun negligently stored law


HB1703--
sponsored by state Representative Laurie Jinkins (D-27) and sixteen other state Representatives. This bill would create a $25 tax on all retail gun sales to create a "firearm-related injury and death prevention program." It would also tax ammunition purchases!


and Senate Bill 5625--
state Senator Adam Kline (D-37). SB 5625 is a companion measure to HB 1588.


WA members start the calls & emails now!


Here are the reps you WA boys want to write.

http://www.leg.wa.gov/house/representatives/pages/pedersen.aspx

Rep Mike Hope http://houserepublicans.wa.gov/mike-hope/contact/


To comment on the gun storage law. I am not actually opposed to it.

https://washingtonleg.granicusideas.com/widget/agenda_items/HB%201676

Jenkins Contact info https://dlr.leg.wa.gov/memberemail/mailform.aspx?chamber=h&district=27&position=1"

 

================

 

This post is not directed to our area, use the Legislature website to find your Legislators (I do not refer to them as Representatives because they are NOT representing Us)

 

===========

 ALERT:

 THERE IS AN ATTEMPT TO REPEAL THE SUBVERSION LAWS IN WA STATE

 

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2013-14/Pdf/Bill%20Reports/House/1062%20HBA%20JUDI%2013.pdf


Posted by Dave at 10:40 AM PST
Thursday, 14 February 2013
NY residents sound off about gun control
Topic: Constitutional
http://nationalresistancegear.com/

Posted by Dave at 2:29 PM PST
Wednesday, 13 February 2013
I TOLD YOU SO _ MURDER IN CALIFORNIA
Topic: Constitutional

I TOLD YOU SO, RIGHT HERE. I PREDICTED WACO AGAIN.

IT HAPPENED YESTERDAY.

 LAPD (?) MURDERED DORNER.

Waco was 3 parts:

1. Demonize someone

2. get them to defend themselves and claim that is an attack on the State

3 MURDER THEM BY SETTING THEIR DWELLING ON FIRE

 The story this morning on Info Wars (I cite them as the story will probably be archived there, where the Main Sleaze Media will make it disappear):

http://www.infowars.com/lapd-audio-from-dorner-siege-burn-this-motherfucker/

 "

“Alright, we’re gonna go ahead with the plan with the burners,” one officer says.

“Copy,” replies another.

“Like we talked about,” the first officer responds.

“The burners are deployed, and we have a fire,” says another officer moments later, before the police dispatcher repeats the statement.

Within minutes of the fire starting, police note that the cabin is “starting to collapse.”"

 A CS CANISTER DOES NOT BURN A HOUSE DOWN IN "MINUTES"

It is not primarily an incendiary device, its supposed to produce gas. 

 Boy, SOMEONE is DESPERATE to get into my computer today... Im seeing attempts to connect being blocked...

 But, you say, Dorner was a murderer and got what he deserved.

You are a COMMUNIST.

In our Nation, he is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY BY A COURT OF LAW, NOT MURDERED BY BLOOD AND REVENGE THIRSTY POLICE.

Police are not Government, they require govt permission to operate, and they do NOT have ours through the Constitution.

Think about this; why is it that POLICE must get a WARRANT from a COURT to SEARCH a CITIZENS property?

Simple, Police are un Constitutional and have no right or permission to search, they must go back to a Constitutional entity (Court) and get permission.

That system is a 100% SCAM. IT IS UN CONSTITUTIONAL

Back to Dorner. Same as in Waco, how much ammo could he have, compared to 100 of them outside? food? water?

Instead of MURDER him, as the MURDERED INNOCENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN WACO, why didnt they just wait it out? take cover and keep him shooting until he runs out of ammo.

But, no, MURDER IS NOW SANCTIONED BY THE STATE.

WE ARE AT NAZI GERMANY

WE ARE AT PAGAN ROME

THIS SHIT HAS TO STOP. 

 The excuse is tha tthe police have some "right" to safety and therefore can justfiy MURDERING HIM.

 GOVERNMENT HAS NO RIGHTS

POLICE HAVE NO RIGHTS

THEY DO IN COMMUNIST CHINA

IN AMERICA, THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHTS, NOT GOVERNMENT. 

We the People NEVER gave "rights" to government, never permitted them to employ Jack Booted Thugs called Police.

If they had OBEYED US, THIS INCIDENT WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED. 

This especially stinks considering it looks as if they went after him for planning to expose them for something, its called "cover-up" 

But, you say, they took him out thus PROTECTING innocent Citzens?

You shit and fell in it too - THEY MURDERED TWO INNOCENT, UN CONNECTED CITIZENS JUST BECAUSE THEY HAD THE SAME KIND OF TRUCK.

Didnt I tell you about this a year ago, about killing not only innocent people, but those totally un connected to the event? I DID, right here 

The BATF got a TANK from the MILITARY, and collapsed then set fire to the buildings at WACO, MURDERING INNOCENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN. I HAVE A VIDEO SHOWING IT, EMAIL FOR A COPY

a_patriot@ymail.com 

Hitlers MO was to create an out-group, demonise them, set up a Straw Man argument that the out group was a danger to the in-group (Ayrian purity, inventing a threat to Germans at large which didnt exist.)


Posted by Dave at 9:30 AM PST
Tuesday, 12 February 2013
SCAM ALERT SCAM ALERT
Topic: General politics

SCAM ALERT

 

Someone claiming to be with a movie production company emailed me hiding behind a Gmail account.

 The email pretends they are doing a made for cable TV documentary about patriots.

Problem is, scammers love to hide behind Gmail accounts. Persons who work for legitimate companies have corporate email accounts on their corporate domain.

heres the email, with headers:

===========

 

Casting a new television show that may be of interest to your members...

Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:26 PM
From Jeff Bornfree Tue Feb 12 14:26:10 2013
X-Apparently-To:   a_patriot@ymail.com via 98.138.210.253; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:26:11 -0800
Return-Path:   <bornfreedoc@gmail.com>
Received-SPF:   p-
X-YMailISG:     g-
X-Originating-IP:   [74.125.83.67]
Authentication-Results:   mta1236.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=gmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=gmail.com; dkim=pass (ok)
Received:   from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mail-ee0-f67.google.com) (74.125.83.67) by mta1236.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:26:11 -0800
Received:   by mail-ee0-f67.google.com with SMTP id t10so110483eei.6 for <a_patriot@ymail.com>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:26:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature:   v
MIME-Version:   1.0
X-Received:   by 10.14.194.4 with SMTP id l4mr68509469een.12.1360707970540; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:26:10 -0800 (PST)
Received:   by 10.14.215.131 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:26:10 -0800 (PST)
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:26:10 -0800
Message-ID:   <CAPjicjf05biQFZweJ+EPUN-me2AOkE4_4Bk4O_uHhnnAmc_RpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:   Casting a new television show that may be of interest to your members...
From:  
Jeff Bornfree <bornfreedoc@gmail.com>  
Add sender to Contacts
To:   a_patriot@ymail.com
Content-Type:   multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b342bf23a266004d58e83db
Content-Length:   4629
Hello!

My name is Jeff. I’m a Casting Director at Firecracker Films, a television production company in California. We are currently producing a new show that we think will be of great interest to your members/readers and I was wondering if you’d be willing to help us spread the word or maybe even might be interested yourself or know somebody who may be interested. Basically, we are looking for Americans from across the country whose strong belief in the constitution sometimes requires them to live interesting lives.

This is the national casting call for the project. Feel free to post it or email anywhere you want. If you have any questions, or ideas on how best to find people to feature, I would love to talk to you. We plan on being as discrete, respectful and sensitive to privacy concerns as possible at this early stage. But we’re looking for some great and true Americans with passionate beliefs and interesting ways of life that could help us show a different way of life that is often underrepresented or skewed by the media.

------------------------------



CALLING ALL PATRIOTS….

Santa Monica-based Firecracker Films is casting an important new documentary series for a major cable channel that will chronicle the lives of people who love America as its Founders intended and live like it.

Do you or a family member belong to a militia? Believe strongly in the second amendment and/or your right to self-preservation? Live in interesting or unique circumstances because of those beliefs? We want to talk to you about your way of life.

If you are interested, think you might be a fit or have any questions, please contact us by emailing bornfreedoc@gmail.com as soon as possible. And if you know someone who fits the above description, please pass this message on to them.

There will be compensation for those stories that are selected to be filmed for the pilot. All information shared will be kept confidential.

Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide!

Jeff
Casting Director
Firecracker Films
Santa Monica, CA

 =======

I looked up Firecracker in CA Secretary of State records, they exist, they have a website.

 That's where it gets troubling. I called the number on the website and a woman answered who claimed she had only worked there 2 days, didnt know what it was about, and that so called Jeff must be a freelance.

The email claims hes a CASTING DIRECTOR at the company. Read it right above here.

 MANAGERS HAVE CORPORATE EMAIL ACCOUNTS. "Director" is a management position.

She hung up on me when I challenged that if she didnt know what's going on, that there must be someone else besides her there to ask.

I called back and a man who claimed to be Jeff answered.

Of course.

I told him the Gmail account looked fishy and he proceeded to explain thats their procedure for contacting multiple people on a  project.

False premise, because ANY corporate domain can have multiple email addresses, all they have to do is BUY them. Many corporate domain accounts have hundreds of email accounts available.

The idea he tried to float is that he needed a Gmail account for each OTHER person he corresponded with. Thts false, all thats needed is one Firecracker address per PROJECT. VERY slick pivot play.

It doesnt take an individual SENDERS email to correspond with a hundred people.

When Gmail is used, monkey business can be pulled behind the Companies back. Beware of car dealers who have salesmen that use Gmail, if they actually work for the Dealer, why dont they have a DEALERS ADDRESS? (joe_schmoe@car company.com)

I told him that I would consider discussing this with them is he FORWARDED INFORMATION VIA THE US MAIL

Then he started changing subjects and engaging in ad homimens.

The problem with 'sending via the mail' is that exposes a scammer to COMMITING A FELONY of mail fraud should their communication be fraudulent or illegal. That exposes them to prison time.

Things put in writing constitute CONTRACTS.Scammers and the dishonest LOVe to use email because they can make promises then refuse to keep them, and it becomes "he said, she said" when theres nothing in writing.

I stopped a phone phisher a couple years ago that was phishing info from a Federal contractors database, who called me and demanded I send personal financial information by phone or email, because they didnt have access to POSTAL MAIL.

I told her the same thing as I did these people - go to hell.

I called the Santa Monica P.D, they didnt know of any scam activity going on with regard to Firecracker, but Google them and read for yourself, especially the LACK of anything to claim as production except for You tube, and the Ripoff Report:

http://www.ripoffreport.com/producers/firecracker-films/firecracker-films-warning-fr-eeed6.htm

Notice the rebuttal, as usual, evades the topics and claims, its attack the victim. Notice their claims of "a great production" that went nowhere.

I can post BS films to Youtube...

 Quite a LACK of produced work of such a STELLAR company.

 Reader, ALWAYS demand they use the Mail, that separates the honest from the scammers. beware, in these down economic times, there are plenty of employment scams floating around Email.

There may be no connection, but firecracker is based in the U.K, and over the last couple years with the economic turn-down, there has been an abundance of Identity Theft emails floating around from the UK claiming that you can work for them as an accounts manager etc and get paid remotely.

 BEWARE>


Posted by Dave at 4:24 PM PST
Updated: Tuesday, 12 February 2013 5:16 PM PST
Wednesday, 6 February 2013
dispelling lies about ethanol
Topic: general rant/rave

I talked with a worker from the Boardman ethanol plant yesterday. He was holding an ALUMINUM butterfly valve body that was the shutoff point for the hose that transfers the distilelrs grain to be shipped.

 The valve was stuck due to junk in between the shaft and body, thats typical for valves.

Point is, I asked him if the byproduct caused any damage to the aluminum and he said "no"

So much for 'ethanol being so corrosive'

He was having to change the flange screws from steel to stainless because of surface rust. Thats expected with water being present.

He verified that the distillers grain went to cattle feed and was a better feed than the original corn.

But that doesnt sit well with the Oil Companies Trolls that hate ethanol because its inexpensive, easy to produce LOCALLY and cuts them out of SALES.

 


Posted by Dave at 10:53 AM PST
Sunday, 27 January 2013
MUST SEE VIDEO (lots of them posted here)
Topic: Constitutional

http://voxvocispublicus.homestead.com/Battle-of-Athens.html

 

 


Posted by Dave at 2:43 PM PST
Thursday, 24 January 2013
EXCELLENT VIDEO
Topic: Constitutional
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZfRaWAtBVg

Posted by Dave at 6:35 PM PST
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
HYPOCRISY ALERT

Hypocritical Sheriffs are claiming they will refuse to enforce Fed laws in re guns, and probably including O'Bombers (who is he blowing up THIS week?) EOs.

 This is a 100% smoke and mirrors campaign so the SOs can take the easy way out if theres a conflict.

Only ONE (State) Ive heard of is considering REAL measures to throw the sons of bitches in PRISON if the step foot in the State, I think it was AZ with their proposed 5 years/$50,000 fine for any Fed that stepped foot into the State.

Anyway, back to Sheriffs hypocrisy:

 stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/01/21/missouri-sheriffs-pledge-to-not-enforce-obamas-gun-control-laws/

=================

These (plural) Sheriffs are BS ARTISTS:

1.) Easy out- laws CONgress makes (such as background checks) are FEDERAL, NOT STATE OR COUNTY. They dont apply to COUNTIES and neither does the Constitution. So, they are saying nothing in making the statement that 'they will not enforce.' Its meaningless to not enforce something that doesnt apply to them.

2.) The Sheriff is not the decider of what Constitutionality is. No one asked him what his opinion of Constitutionality was.

NO PART OF SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED NEEDS DECIDED UPON

3.) Heres where the HYPOCRISY comes in. Sheriffs are ALREADY enforcing un Constitutional laws in re Concealed Carry.

Its one thing to be lied to, a worse thing to be lied to with hypocrisy.

These Sheriffs are not looking out for your Rights, they could give a flying f___ less about you, this is a TURF WAR and they are saying "how dare anyone else intrude on my sacred ground"

If these Sheriffs were not two faced hypocrites, they be coming out and saying they'd arrest any Fed or Statie that stepped foot in the County, and back it up with a Possee of 10,000 men.

I hate liars, especially when they run the scam that somehow lying to me is to my benefit.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED does not allow background checks or CCW permits.

What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED allows for Govt to issue PERMITS?


 


Posted by Dave at 10:58 AM PST
Monday, 21 January 2013
WACO VIDEO
Topic: General politics

I have a video that contains clips from the original Waco video along with commentary and interviews with people surrounding the mass murder of innocent Citizens at Waco by Jack Booted Janet and the ATF.

 It shows them collapsing the buildings in on top of the people and setting them on fire.

 Women and children were executed.

Is that "saving even one life?"

If you want a copy, send me a DVD mailer with return address and postage and a $5 donation to cover frying my DVD burner and time

 

PO 1336

Richland WA 99352 


Posted by Dave at 1:24 PM PST
Thursday, 17 January 2013
RKBA Rally Hermiston OR Sat

RKBA Rally at Hermiston Oregon, a 'right side of the State' event since many cannot make it to the State House for the State House rally.

This was on TV tonite, shockingly, it was absent the usual TC media Leftist - communist bias  

http://www.nbcrightnow.com/story/20618648/hermiston-nra-instructor-organizing-2nd-amendment-rally 

 This is being put on by Jerry Hennings, I talked with him tonight to verify it.

 The Park at which its planned is 200 feet to a School and apparently the law is that a CCW permit is required to carry there in the park.

Crock o Crap it is. 


Posted by Dave at 9:53 PM PST
DoD, Facebook and hacking

Recently I posted that the DoD must be fascinated with my little computer as they daily made a dozen attempts to hack my NTOSKRNL32.exe file.

 That file IS Windows.

The attempts were from two IP addresses (or from one through a second)

10.158.207.157
28.238.72.77 (registered to DoD in Cols OH)

I wrote to my Congress rep Hastings who forwarded it to FBI, which immediately, of course, dismissed it.

Shortly after that, I began getting sneak attacks from another IP address:

10.158.207.13

That is close to the 10... address above. Its common for entities to have/reserve/use many addresses in a certain range.

Who is  10.158.207.13"

 FACEBOOK (I call them "F"-book out of contempt)

How do I know that its F-book when 10.xxx.xxx.xxx are private, unregistered addresses?

Easy - "Exact, repeated correlation"

When I attempt to post comments on websites that only use F-book for comment posting, and receive an attempt to sneak into NTOS at the same time from that IP address, and block it, and Fbook hangs up, that proves its Fbook.


Posted by Dave at 11:57 AM PST
MUST SEE VIDEO

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8

 

It is unlikely that nothing happened there, that would require funerals being staged. Something did. The link between the FEMA DHS etc exercises leads to two possibilities:

1. Staged by the Feds

2. by someone else in response or retaliation to the drills

Theres one obvious conclusion, made obvious by the question:

 "Which Party(ies) in the two above suppositions, has or is connected with:

1 guaranteed Govt legal exoneration for everything up to MURDER

2. access to control the media

Obvious, aint it?

unlike the Waco video, this cant be buried that quickly. I saw the long version of the Waco video, i regret loaning it out and not getting it back. It showed a tank moving back from a building and setting it on fire.

So what is the gun in the trunk video?

The supposed AR removed from the trunk - the person clearing it is moving a mechanism that appears to be on the middle-front-right side of the firearm

ARs dont work that way, the bolt is operated from a T-handle on the top, rear of the upper receiver.

Go back to the TV series "24". The scene where Jack is in the tunnel attacking the armored limo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

00:01, thats an AR variant, 223 casings apparently from the size. They are NOT ejecting forward.

00:10 shootout with a 1911-45, probably?

00:13 look carefully at what hes carrying

00:20 FREEZE FRAME. Look at the charging handle location on the rifle being fired. IT AINT AN AR, thats hanging down at the right with what appears to be a 40 round mag

00:21 FREEZE FRAME

Freeze the scene where hes standing on the trunk and shooting a hole through the bullet resistant rear window.

Holding a rifle with the action on the middle-front left. That is not an AR.

Compare that to the video of whats being handled near the vehicle trunk

I recall this as Id noticed this scene in 24 and had asked a firearms expert what that was.

It AINT an AR-15/

 

 

 


Posted by Dave at 11:14 AM PST
Updated: Thursday, 17 January 2013 11:31 AM PST

Newer | Latest | Older