« October 2010 »
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
and now, Benton?
Chamish
Constitutional
Economy, what's left of
General politics
general rant/rave
Kennewick Illegal
Legal actions
Richland illegal
Seattle illegal
Second-Amendment
WA Illegal
WA media anti 2A bias
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Dave's 2A Blog
Saturday, 16 October 2010
FEDS PLANT PIPE BOMB IN CITIZENS CAR
Topic: General politics

FEDS PLANT PIPE BOMB IN CITIZENS CAR

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101016/ap_on_re_us/us_gps_tracking_warrants#mwpphu-post-form

Realize my following comments are not from some right wing conspiracy theorist cackling about impossible feats such as a satellite reading a chip in someones arm, I CAN DESIGN THIS ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT.

 Lies and misleading statements here:

 1.) These so called "GPS tracking devices" are NOT GPS. "GPS" stands for Global Positioning System which uses three or four MICROWAVE signals from orbiting SATELLITES to determine location. THOSE SIGNALS WILL NOT RELIABLY APPEAR UNDER A METAL CAR BODY WITH A RECEIVER TUCKED UP INSIDE.

 Microwave signals are PURELY LINE OF SIGHT. Such real devices use cell phone signals (860 MHz) or other similar frequencies that can bounce around under a car, and dont require 3 or 4 SIMULTANEOUS GOOD SIGNALS from a satellite to operate.A cell system can easily triangulate such a device.

2.) There is NOTHING that such a device does that needs 

a.) Two units connected by a cable

b.) either unit, if there were two, that would be installed in a ROUND TUBE SUCH AS PIPE BOMBS ARE MADE OF. That round tube would be a circuit designer/packagers nightmare to stuff circuits into, AND IVE BEEN THERE AND DONE THAT.

The rectanguar box with short antenna is sufficient, exactly those devices are Publically sold. The stub protruding from the rectangular unit is a few cm. in length, easily enough to transmit/receive high UHF signals. That stub is NOT a microwave antenna...

Such a system under a vehicle makes a PERFECT receiver.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101016/ap_on_re_us/us_gps_tracking_warrants#mwpphu-post-form

Oil change reignites debate over GPS trackers

SAN FRANCISCO – Yasir Afifi, a 20-year-old computer salesman and community college student, took his car in for an oil change earlier this month and his mechanic spotted an odd wire hanging from the undercarriage.

The wire was attached to a strange magnetic device that puzzled Afifi and the mechanic. They freed it from the car and posted images of it online, asking for help in identifying it.

Two days later, FBI agents arrived at Afifi's Santa Clara apartment and demanded the return of their property — a global positioning system tracking device now at the center of a raging legal debate over privacy rights.

 =============== PS ==========

While walking and thinking about what I wrote above, it appears some details may not be clear to you who havent an engineering background, and they are critical... both electrical/RF and political engineering...

1.) The reason the square box tube is favored vs. the round tube  for circuit design and packaging is, for a device thats supposed to pick up Sat signals at microwave frequencies, is the antenna. Antennas at such high frequencies are not long things with wires poking out as in a TV antenna, they are, in a flat configuration, a "patch antenna" (google the term). In a round configuration, a microwave antenna could be a long, round tube, but the considerations are this:

a.) patch antennas and round both have high gain, but round are very directional. patch are broader. If the goal was to pick up a moving signal from under a car (the car is moving with respect to the sat signals) the the round will not work. Neither would likely have the gain to pick up a sat signel in any case It is difficult and wasteful to try to cram circuitry in a round tube if the rect. box was the antenna, and conversely, the round antenna would have to be pointed directly at the sat to pick up its signal. SInce there are 3 - 4 sats that must be received, that would mean 3-4 round antennas. Not happening..

2.) political - The Feds are playing off the recently fogotten news of Fahad Shahzal (correct name? NYC "bomber" who didn't have a bomb) to set this poor mark up as the next Muslim bomber. This is a careful tactic in two ways, 1.) to play on peoples psychological tendency to say "oh, not again" and 2.) to play on the "the NYC bomb didnt go off, but this one (a round tube full of C-4) did," and make use of the "slippery slope" (i.e. things are getting worse, we need more Govt /Police power, a convenient play after being found totally incompetent to stop any threats)

Maybe this guy is back on taxes or has pissed off some Fed agency, so hes a good mark. He has a Muslim sounding name, so they chose him to demonize. The round tube is full of C-4 (why the FBI wanted it back SO BAD instead of just ignoring it with no trail of who it belonged to) with an electronic detonating link via the cable (it wasnt a "wire", its a 2 or 3 circuit jack  from the photo) and the rect. box is a cell phone receive. Such devices are Internet available. The Feds follow Poor Mark downtown and sit just within the blast radius and when Mark is in the car, call the number and dial a code (detonation must be coded to prevent a wrong number from setting it off)  and BOOM , the car vaporizes. Theres nothing left of the device to trace, its vaporized. Or, alternately, if they want to further demonize him and "prove" it was a Muslim conspiracy, they wait until he leaves the car to set it off. Then the show trial begins.

  They sit just within the blast radius, not close enough to get seriously injured, but close enough to claim involvement so they can pump the Media full of shit about how bad it was.  The Media are always after the angle of what bystanders "feel" so the Feds are conveniently planted right on the scene to program them.

  Maybe hes written some emails that could vaguely be interpreted as a threat, pissed off at corrupt Govt like the rest of us Honest Citizens, and maybe they hack his computer and Email account and forge the contents to read something about intent to make a car bomb.

Mark cant prove any of it, and the Courts will, of course, listen to the Feds.

Check under your cars WEEKLY.

 Read this  http://www.accutracking.com/ Theyre doing false advertising, GPS is NOT CELL TRACKING. GPS = microwave (5 GHz, I believe) cell phones = 860 MHz . Ignorant folk in the Media are neither trained to know such details, nor to ask - they just broadcast the Govt line.

http://www.gpsfortoday.com/cell-phone-gps-tracking/

Correct, some phones do have true GPS capabilities, but most just use triangulation.

Here is a GPS tracker WITH EXTERNAL PATCH ANTENNA. Its blind as a bat underneath the vehicle without the antenna:

 http://www.gpstrackingdevices4u.com/covert-vehicle-tracking-p-118.html

 GPS instaltion requiring" direct line of sight to the sky."

http://www.gpsvehiclefinder.com/tracking.php?devices=plugandplay

============  UPDATE 10/18/2010 ===============

Being curious, I took this news story with photo to someone with mil explosives expertise. I can claim expertise at the radio and electronics, but my explosives goes as far as firecrackers and an understanding of detonation veolcity.

(Q. Whats the difference between a competent and incompetent explosives Tech?

A About 8,000 Meters per Second. )

  Said individual looked at the story and photograph for a few seconds and responded - "THATS A BOMB."

-------- 13 Nov 2010

The cell phone tracking device does not need triangulation to determine location, it only needs a reasonable amount of time in which to receive ONE cell tower.

 Cell phone systems contain more or less 3-D maps of their coverage area just with one signal. Ive seen such maps. So dont believe anyone who tries to deceive you into thinking that only GPS can track a vehicle.


Posted by Dave at 3:01 PM PDT
Updated: Tuesday, 28 June 2011 9:32 PM PDT
Sunday, 26 September 2010
MUST READ DOCUMENT
Topic: Constitutional

Drop whatever it is youre doing (including reading this Blog) and READ THIS, all 140 pages. The survival of your Nation may depend on it.

 Center for Security Policy Team B II Report on infiltration of the US by Islamic Sharia

 http://tool.donation-net.net/Act4America/ThreatReport.cfm?dn=1097&commID=37994637&ID=218692


Posted by Dave at 3:19 PM PDT
Updated: Friday, 1 October 2010 10:18 AM PDT
Tuesday, 14 September 2010
GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERRORISM IN RICHLAND, WA, USA
Topic: general rant/rave

EDITED 10/3

I would post this under "Richland illegal" but actually its just "Richland stupid"

 Thayer Drive this afternoon, RPD out playing soldier, setting off bombs in a crowded neighborhood with a preschool and churches on the one side, and a neighborhood on the other.

 I drove by and saw the vehicles there, they had an armored car on the property (old brown prefab nouse on the West side across from/down from the church preschool or daycare, whatever it is) and a bunch of, I assume, police dressed in their finest Jack Booted Thug outfits.

I guess Police work is boring, we have to play military?

I stopped and talked with a local, mentioned that I wondered if I was going to see anything stupid, and he agreed. Sure enough, I did.

I saw about 10 of them slowly walking up in front of the house, around the steps, up the steps... slowly, methodically.. Im wondering who will point the muzzle of their gun at sombodys back first.

 To my amazement, I didnt see that- they were all pointed down excep for one that I could see, by then, through my pocket scope. What I did see was a bunch of people who would get SLAUGHTERED in a real showdown.

What I saw belonged more at Halloween than a tactic training session. Walked slowly, bunched up together, too overdressed to move, and RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE BAY WINDOW BESIDE THE FRONT DOOR.

 JUST STOOD THERE. 

I'd have been amazed had I not seen enough idiocy already in my life.

Can you say "TARGETS"?

Didn't see anyone go in the back door.

Some Perp inside with a modified AR or 12 gauge with slugs hiding INSIDE below that window would make MINCE MEAT out of them before ANY of them except the last two/three, one with a 45, would have had a clue what was going on. The "one" had muzzle up, out of sight from the window, in a position where he was not visible from inside. He might have survived the initial attack.

Now, if all slinging shit breaks loose inside the house, the 4 in the front would have no where to go except run into (or accidentally shoot) the six behind them. 

this reminds me of a Richard Pryor sketch with he and his Father hunting:

"Theres a bear"

"Which way you gonna run"

"I dunno, why"

"I just wanna know so I dont run over your ass"

 Actually I'd be UNDER THE WINDOW, NOT standing there like a WHACK A MOLE FIGURE.

Just WALKED UP TO THE DOOR LIKE THEY WANTED TRICK OR TREAT CANDY.

Someone went in and fired 3 rounds, NATO style. Blanks? I didnt see blank-adapters on the AR-15s. Or was it live ammo in a residential neighborhood?

Later, I heard two loud explosions (or was it three) from a quarter mile away and dogs going crazy. Does the STUPIDITY get any more BRAZEN?

Thats not a rhetorical question, Id like an answer.

It's a RESIDENTIAL AREA  PEOPLE.

And on top of that, lets use AR 15s in a DENSE RESIDENTIAL AREA -oh, maybe across from a PRESCHOOL - so a round can go through 6 (or more, depending) houses and kill some innocent child before it stops (a half mile away). NO- LETS HAVE A DOZEN TRIGGER HAPPY FOOLS FIRING AT ONCE, MAYBE WE CAN KILL SEVERAL CITIZENS AT ONCE?

AR 15, 223 65 gr.@  3000 feet per second will stop, Idunno, in the NEXT COUNTY?

THAT will put Fry Cities on the World Map!

At the position most of them were, a loose round would have nowhere to go except through another house on Thayer, or down into Old Richland and hit someone elses house down there. Maybe one of the businesses on Wellsian?

I seriously doubt this crew is smart enough to use low power frangs to keep from killing some innocent neighbor, are they?

=================

Bin Laden, dont worry, if you come here, you wont be challenged except by the Trick or Treat Squad.

 

Signed, I.M. Pissed (that was my Grandfathers pseudonym)

============Detailed analysis=================

"The Force" (sorry, I cant resist a little creative writing now and then!) tells me that many of you reading this yesterday (RECORD number of hits on this Blog, by the way) dont understand the depth of the arrogance and DANGER here, so here's a detailed analysis from tactics and PHYSICS, with pictures. 

Waco, TX. UN-MANIPULATED video that I saw courtesy of Linda Thompson (read about this  elsewhere on this Blog) showed a similar situation (being careful to define "similar" correctly). Five (best I recall) Storm Troopers climbed a ladder onto a first - story roof. One moron shot himself in the leg with HIS OWN 45. and was out of the equation (maybe there had been 6, dont recall exactly). The "jist" is that once on the roof, two (or was it 3?) entered a second story window and IMMEDIATELY after disappearing inside, the remainder (outside the window) started FIRING LIVE ROUNDS INSIDE. The inescapable presumption is that the two (3) that had entered were killed by "friendly fire"

 Let this example set the stage for the next comments - poorly trained Jack Booted Thugs and an "inside - outside" scenario.

See the photos here of the house in question on Thayer Drive in Richland WA and notice the neighborhood - densely populated with a Montesori (?) SCHOOL across the street, a Synagogue next to it. Behind the latter two, a steep hill, a business district, grassy space and Old Richland (post War dense housing dedicated to the nuclear production at Hanford) I LIVE IN ONE OF THOSE HOUSES.

5,000 people here in the area I just described on an average day? REICHland is 50K-ish.

 

 Photo 1, essentially the view I had, including with my spotting scope. I had a view good enough to see the blue tape on the 45 at the back, and see the muzzle brakes on the ARS, and there WERE NO BLANK-TRAINING ADAPTERS ON THE BARRELS. "Adapter" means a gadget that goes into the end of the barrel that is used with BLANK ROUNDS FOR TRAINING. Blanks dont have enough force to activate the mechanism of the rifle to cycle in semi or full auto modes, the adapter slows the rate of escape of the gasses to build enough pressure to trip the gas tube system and throw the bolt back to get another round from the magazine.

"NO BLANK ADAPTERS" EITHER MEANS THEIR MAGAZINES WERE EMPTY, OR THEY HAD LIVE ROUNDS LOADED IN AN AR-15 IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. 

Link to a "blank adapter" for sale:

http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/ARR223-7.html 

 Magazines. ARs can use 10, 20, 30, 40, 90, 100, 150.. round magazines. Best I recall (as this wasnt what i was focusing on at the time) they had 20s. They clearly werent 40s.

Whats also critical is that the AR lower (the rifle splits into two sections, an "upper" and a "lower" ) can accomodate 22, 223, 6.8mm, 308, 40, 5.56 NATO, 7.62 x 39, .450 calibers. VERY IMPORTANT. I could not tell how they were built from that distance. 

The 22 is mainly for a cheap training round without recoil and some miscellaneous varmit hunting, 22s are 4 cents a piece, the other, larger caliber rounds, are 50 cents a piece. Its gets expensive to spend a dozen mags... 

http://www.bushmaster.com/products.asp?cat=6 

THE 223, 308, 7.62 x 39 AND 450 WILL GO THROUGH ANYTHING, INCLUDING SOLID STEEL PLATES. The 450 especially. The 223 will go through 1/4" steel plate.

 THESE ROUNDS WILL GO THROUGH THE DAYCARE CENTER, SYNAGOGUE OR NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES LIKE THE WALLS ARE NOT THERE, JUST LIKE IN WACO.

 

DO YOU UNDERSTAND? YOU DAMNED WELL BETTER, IN CASE THEY PLAY STORM TROOPER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

The 223 wil go through steel (a water pressure tank, in one instance I saw) like PAPER. I saw a 223 round go into a curved pressure tank end (entering on an angle) and exited the SIDE of the tank at an angle, with NOT A TRACE OF DEFLECTION. A 7.62 will go through a 2 x 4 like PAPER. I tested this, the 2 x 4 at 40 feet DIDNT EVEN MOVE when the bullet went THROUGH IT.

JUST LIKE THEY WILL GO THROUGH THE HOUSES IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. 

 THE 450 WILL GO THROUGH BRICK FASCIA LIKE IT AINT EVEN THERE, SO DONT PRETEND THAT BRICK OR CONCRETE ARE GOING TO STOP IT FROM KILLING SOMEONE IN AN ADJOINING STRUCTURE. Only solind poured concrete will slow down or stop these rounds. RE DBRICKS AND BLOCKS ARE HOLLOW, AND FRAGILE.


First picture, see the red rectangles? Ignore the individual for a moment, and look at the GROUPING of what's happening. These guys were packed together like sardines.

Photo A. Recalling the WACO MASSACRE BY ANOTHER ILLEGAL SWAT TEAM, the RIchland "SWAT Team"  had a TANK with one man standing up and out of the top with, I assume, an AR. From his position on the far left of the house, he had nothing in this except observing and looking threatening.

Lets pretend.

The Clown Act starts with Groups B thru E who, in a real situation, are about to get SLAUGHTERED and/or are about to kill INNOCENT CITIZENS INSIDE THEIR HOMES / CHURCHES / SYBAGOGUE / SCHOOLS / BUSINESSES

Now before we proceed, recall that the Police, Government and Left Wing Anti Constitutionalists Whack-os are the one who JUST TRIED TO OUTLAW AR15s IN WA STATE BECAUSE THEY ARE SOME SUPPOSED PUBLIC DANGER.

ARENT THEY THE SAME OR WORSE DANGER  IN THE HANDS OF 10 POORLY TRAINED "SWAT TEAM" MEMBERS? 

 Anyhoo, the 10 or so are bunched tightly together with (apparently) vests and I presume, bullet resistant liners. I could not tell if they had plates, but it didnt appear so as I didnt see any obvious pouches. Some had back-packs. Vests, yes, backpacks, no, no application here. Theres nothing in this scene that needs a back-pack, ESPECIALLY bunched up together and not able to GET OUT OF THE WAY IF SHOOTING STARTS.

 Group B is on the porch and going to enter the front door. They pushed it open and walked in, no one breached it with explosives. BOTH DOORS are STILL THERE SEVERAL DAYS LATER. C is bunched together right behind A and is on the steps. D is a little more spread out, sideways against the front of the house WITH THEIR VESTS NOT BETWEEN THEM AND THE HOUSE. E is at the corner of the house and not in front of the window in the house. The lead individual in D has a 45 with blue tape in his right hand, muzzle up at ready towards the house where it belongs. Those with ARs had muzzles down towards the block foundation where a loose round will riccochet and as tightly as they are packed together HIT ONE OF THEM.

B are facing the door. If they have vests with plates and someone inside starts shooting at the door, they might survive. C and D are STANDING WITH THEIR VESTS TOWARDS B and worse yet, with their bodies exposed to the window and wall below. Unless they have vests with SIDE PLATES, they are going to get BUTCHERED if someone inside cuts loose with automatic fire. NO CHANCE OF SURVIVAL.

And the have the nerve to call this cluster- fuck TACTICAL TRAINING? 

Sorry about the language, but the depth of stupidity and danger requires its use to clearly get across to you the sheer magnitude of the incompetence here. 

Now, the "lets pretend" part.

Here they are, as diagrammed above. Realize Im giving you a snapshot of more or less the most dangerous part of the scene that I saw. Im not giving you a movie review, Im replaying whats in my head, concentrating on critical details.

Theres one or more in Group Z inside the house ( or Innocent Citizens (ICs) being targeted for execution for their religious beliefs as were in Waco), but lets assume Z because none of this works with IC's. 

Z is inside the living room waiting for the Trick or Treat Troupe but Z aint got candy.

No one outside can see Z  who is on the floor inside the living room of the house. The idiot on top of the tank cant see the front window, so B-E are walking up to the front door BLIND. The only people A can see to shoot at are HIS OWN TEAM MATES.

Z starts shooting an automatic weapon from right to left, door first since thats where the 'assault' (from Z's perspective) is coming from. Lets assume a 7.62 x 39 AK 47 full auto, 30 round magazine, common firearm.  Terrorists like those that Obama and his DoJ and DHS are allowing to FREELY AND UNCHALLENGED walk over the Mexican border like to use these Russian supplied guns.

Assume a sweep rate of 'front door to corner of house" of 3 seconds. Most people arent trained to perceive one-second, let alone react to events that fast. The firing rate is, lets assume, 8 rounds per second (I dont know exactly what it is, and it can vary). Lets assume both rates are linear.

8 / second x 3 seconds = 25 rounds with 6 spare in the magazine. If you cant follow the math, then take it for evidence that you dont understand firearms and tactics. you werent expecting a 30 round magazine and one in the chamber = 31. I tricked you, and thats the jist of tactics.

 There are 10 outside, 3 are in Group E. Lets say B = 2, C=2, D=3 and E=3  are 10 individuals.

10 men outside, with TWENTY FIVE ROUNDS coming out at POINT BLANK RANGE. The 2x4 studs in the walls will not stop the 7.62 round. The drywall and plywood wont even slow it down, and horizontal solid pine sheathing - right through it like its not even there. The morons in D are standing with NO ARMOR TOWARDS THE HOUSE AND EVEN IF THEY HAD TACTICAL CARRIERS WITH SIDE PLATES (not likely, thats working on $ 3000 worth of hardware)  THEIR HEADS AND SHOULDERS ARE DIRECTLY IN THE LINE OF FIRE, AND Z EVEN LYING DOWN, IS ABOVE THEM AND CAN SHOOT OVER THE PLATES INTO THE VITALS.

Ignoring for a moment, the distribution of the rounds fired in an arc (trig problem), possible jamming of Zs weapon (possible if Z is not trained, highly unlikely if Z is)  recoil, and a few other considerations (lets make it simple enough for the women at the daycare center to understand, because they are potentially in the line of fire) thats 2 + rounds to hit each of the members of B-D.

E ain't falling for this (or just out of sheer luck survive because they came in last), and have taken up a position at the end of the house. But, a 7.62 doesnt care about a pissy little 2x 4. The only thing that saves them is their POSITION and maybe the fact that E-lead has a 45 at ready which will also go through the house.

ALL of Groups B-D are DEAD from Z's initial attack, and Z has 6 rounds to go vs 3 x n outside (E havent fired yet, so n might = 10). A is standing there with his dick in his hand and cant do anything except shoot at his own men because he cant see anything. A has a lot of house to shoot through and no way to see inside.

A wasnt smart enough to park in FRONT OF THE HOUSE? Id take the trash dumpster over thin air- I can find enough solid steel in the Richland roll off dumpster to stop or spin a 223 round to hide behind. A has his own ass covered, letting his buddies go get KILLED. 

So theres the idea, we should fire the Richland PD and SWAT and replace them with the CITY SANITATION DEPT. Theyd be smart enough to parf the truck in front of the house and hide behind it.

B are dead because the 7.62s went through their 3A vests like they werent even there. Hell, a 9 +P will do that, Ive SEEN IT. Right thru 3A PLUS a tank of water and kept right on going.

C are dead because they are on the steps sideways with not even a vest between them and Z

D only might escape with their heads in the line of fire because the head is a smaller target than the upper body, but its not a gamble I'd take!  D's vests (worthless as they are) are facing FRONT providing NO protection whatsoever. If they do have armor plates, there are still WAY too many gaps in ballistic armor for a 7.62 to go through. They probably are killed from an upper body shot.

E probably escaped on nothing but luck as if the front door was the souce (by Z's perspective) then its not logical for Z to continue shooting from the corner around. Z is going to swing back West and unload the magazine, taking out any of the fools that escaped on nothing but luck on Zs way East. Z cant see E and doesnt know E is there. E are the ONLY ones who have come anywhere NEAR PRACTICING ANY KIND OF TACTICS.

Unless Z is an idiot, Z has extra magazines, but whats the point? if this is terrrorist training, the explosives that Z planted take out A, or, Z just says "fuck it" and blows the whole house to Kingdom Come, taking out C-E instantly and probably killing A from shrapnel, as hes standing waist and upper body out of the tank (which is nothing but a paperweight at the moment- at least it will PROTECT THE INNOCENT CITIZENS IN THE HOUSE TO THE WEST. I don't know who the concrete foundation will come down on, but now were getting a bit off topic.

Now, thats hardly the end of it. The 7.62 rounds that just went out of the house keep on going, unless they hit bone or ceramic plates, and go through the houses across the street.

HERE IS MY MAIN POINT, HERE IS WHERE THIS IS NO LONGER ASSUMPTION OR ARGUMENT:

 Scenario # 2

  B-E have AR15s, probably 223's. Z bangs one off, and due to lack of TRAINING, HALF OF B-E start shooting out of surprise.

((10 x 20) /2) = UP TO ONE - HUNDRED ROUNDS OF 223 FMJ AT 3000 FEET PER SECOND ARE GOING SOMEWHERE, and PROBABLY THROUGH THIS HOUSE AND INTO THE HOUSE BEHIND IT, and THE HOUSE BEHIND IT, AND THE HOUSE BEHIND IT.

Remember, a 223 will go through a 1/4 inch steel plate, and from the stupidity Ive described so far, they are probably using armor piercing rounds, or at a minimum, FMJ "range rounds" (223 x 45, 55, 65...) If I was stupid enough to use a 223 in CQB, it would be with low power frangibles that have a chance of NOT going half way down the block through 4 houses, but I tkink ahead of someone but MYSELF.

The second photograph shows the neighborhood their rounds will go through. Z is inside the house, and those outside will probably only shoot into the house UNLESS D freaks out and shoot B and C...

 Now, maybe you still dont understand my point about "going through anything, including brick." Heres the physics of it:

F-= m V^2, set m = 1 (it cant be zero, in practice its 45 - 75 grain)

 Force equals velocity squared when the projectile mass is unity. Look at a graph of the squared-function:

 http://www.themathpage.com/aprecalc/graph-of-parabola.htm#parabola

 Look at the left side of the third graph from the top. See how the graph shape more or less goes vertical?

3000 fps (3 x 10^3) BECOMES 3,000,000,000 WHEN SQUARED. Multiply the fractional bullet mass in and that 10 place number is reduced, but you get the idea.

The muzzle velocity of a 223 is around 2950 - 3200 feet per second, which may as well plug infinity into the equation. Theres no stopping it EXCEPT that the bullet hits something very dense and fragments or mushrooms.

Training

The story is that this was a SWAT training exercise. Several SERIOUS problems with that:

1.) "training" indicates that they are not already "trained" else such elementary "training": would not be necessary. This is probably SOBamas Simulus money at work.

2.) the purpose of (tactical) training is to permanently "burn" the concepts and practices into the trainees mind of what to do in a REAL situation.

a.) insufficient training or no training leaves the mind free to wander into areas like "going spastic and shooting at random" 

b.)  improper training (such as teaching these trainees to stand like WHACK A MOLE FIGURES in front of the window) is EXACTLY WHAT THEY WILL DO IN A REAL SITUATION.  If not, then the training didnt work, and we pray thats the case here. 

3.) Militaries are CONSTANTLY and REPEATEDLY DAILY TRAINED to respond to such situations, these people are NOT military and NOT so trained to handle military tactics and weapons. Thats why we leave the military to the mil and ticket writing to Police.

It is not only DANGEROUS but ILLEGAL to mix the two. 

Military are trained to only kill people.

PDs are supposed to do LAW ENFORCEMENT which implies DUE PROCESS. Butchering Citizens in the streets is NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT.

The latter, Police murdering Citizens for no good reason, has reached epidemic proportion in America and has to stop.

Back to "constant training"

 To maintain ANY skill, repeated practice is required, on TOP of training. Police cannot do that, thus, their SWAT training is useless or even dangerous to themselves and others as evidenced by this circus.

  Since it is impossible to train in advance for every tactical situation, thinking on ones feet is mandatory, and from what I saw here, that level of training is light years away.

Police have too much other crap to deal with (jobs, cars, lights, sirens, paperwork, computers and a ridiculous myriad of laws from our Joke of a Legislature) to be trusted with such responsibilites. Military forces concentrate on one thing, and one thing only - SURVIVING BY KILLING THE ENEMY.

It is INTOLERABLE to even attempt to push Police into such a dangerous role as DISASTER WILL BE THE RESULT, THEY ARE NOT AND CAN NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY TRAINED FOR A JOB THEY HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL BUSINESS DOING IN THE FIRST PLACE.

 Definition of terrorism

 Words have meanings and your Government and Media are lying through their teeth to you on this one. So - called "radical Islam" (or whatever group they are demonizing at the moment).

The root word of 'terrorism' is 'terror' which means to make people afraid. Terrorists work to destablize normal society (without defining 'normal') by doing acts such as planting fake bombs at some Govt building.

Military operatives such as 'militant Islam" don't play terrorist games anymore, they are out to KILL PEOPLE. AND THEY DONT GIVE A DAMN IF THEY GO TOO. This makes for an enemy that cannot be beaten - if there are a million of them, they ya' gotta kill  a million of them to stop them.

 Militaries operate to KILL PEOPLE, plain and simple.

Police Departments have NO BUSINESS pretending they are some kind of anti-terrorism function because theyve lost before they've begun. These militants arent playig ice cream parlor, they are out to KILL JEWS AND AMERICANS, WhEREVER THEY FIND THEM.

Proof? The man from the Tri Cities Islam Center who went to Seattle and killed a woman because she was JEWISH.

With the CORRECT definitions in place, consider what chance the Trick of Treat Squad has against MILITANTS? What chance to those with occasional training have? Approximately NONE.

In this Nation, under OUR CONSTITUTION, the RIGHT and RESPONSIBILITY to protect the Nation against such threats LIES SOLEY WITH THE PEOPLE, NOT GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS AND MILITARY.

It is TREASON to attempt to undermine the Constitution and implement ANY OTHER SYSTEM, regardless of how carefully we try to sell it.

The 110 MILLION of us that are armed are why every power on the face of the Earth is afraid to step foot here and screw with us, because they will LOSE.

Domestic, Government sponsored Terrorism sponsored by the City of RIchland, WA

What the above story explains is not SWAT training, it is deliberate, premeditated GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERRORISM against CITIZENS.

  Logically, since they are not Constitutionally authorized to engage in MILITARY activities, and the current enemy (even if they must INVENT one) is a MILITARY FORCE, they are not authorized nor equipped nor trained to do so.

The gross incompetence I wrote about above, coupled with the fact that there were no "tactics" shown, indicate this whole scene is not SWAT training, for such training would have a certain, useful end, that is, tactical training. Even in the "end justifies the means' scenario, the end must represent the means. The utter incompetence here is not tactical training, because there were no tactics involved. This only leaves one assumption, deliberate attampts to terrorize Citizens, to make them afraid of the Jack Booted Thug force with their military gear,rifles and grenades.

"Real or not"

 Radical Islam could give a rats ass less about you,  their enemy are Governments and the World Trade system, not you in Nowheresville, WA.

This is proven by the fact that "they" are, and have been, here for years, and are, or have been, well armed. Heard of any Islamic terrorism lately in the US? No.

An FBI agent about 1994 told me about a cache of weapons in Chicago owned by the, as he put it, "rag heads" (Arabic people, without being specific).

  Yes, :"they" are real, and armed, but, no, they dont give a damn about you or they could have poisoned your water supply by now.

 

The Stockholm syndrome 

So, where are the attacks on us?

There arent any, its a FAUX ENEMY. But a convenient one for falsifying a crisis, and needing to protect us.

Ill protect myself, thanks so much.

Let me redefine 'faux enemy" as its not completely 'faux' - there is an enemy. Some allege we have created him.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/cover061107h.htm

 There are two or more enemies in a conflict, "us" and "them" - but in this case, "us" isnt "us", its our Federal Government and military. The sham is to attempt to use fearmongering to coerce Citizens into thinking we are also the "enemy"

If so, it would have already been "on" so to speak.

The premise of the Stockholm Syndrome is to cause a hostage (you and I) to identify with the captor (Government, Police, whoever) and what better ways to propagate that scam than a SHOW OF FORCE BY RICHLANDS JACK BOOTED TROUPE?

It works out both ways - either makes people pretend they are protected when they are not, or intimidates them into fear, or TERRORISM.

Read the above website and notice this statement when discussing terrorists:

"We know that the members of the "domestic" terror cell dubbed as the "Fort Dix Six" utilized a rural area in the Pennsylvania Pocono Mountains to conduct paramilitary training using semi-automatic weapons--training they intended to put into practice against one of America's military installations where they intended to kill as many soldiers and base staff as possible."

There is no substantive diference between THIS terrorist training and what i saw in the so called SWAT training, EXACTLY the same, just different facces.

 

A quandry, damned either way

 Now, lets totally reverse course.

Lets say there is a threat here from Militant Islam.

What are the Police going to do? This is NOT law enforcement, we're being attacked by a MILITARY FORCE that Obama and the Feds are allowing to walk across the Mexican border, BTW.

What do they do, stand there and write out tickets to the invaders? No, for they not only are not part of our legal system, but I don't think they will accept tickets.

What do they do? Theres nothing they CAN DO.The premise set forth in the book Patriots is that they go home and protect their own families.

The charade of the Police State only works when they can keep Citizens afraid, as in Chicago where the M.O. is "violate the Constitution, disarm citizens, establish the Police state, establish crime, then play both sides against the middle. to keep our JOBS"

But, today, Chicago Police are on a tear because of finances. "Not enough manpower" Not enough manpower? If 3/4ths of Chicago was armed, there would BE NO NEED FOR POLICE. There is no need for them (mostly) in Kennesaw GA where a mandatory gun ownership law has almost ELIMINATED crime:

 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1818862/posts

The Quandry is right now, backfiring on them, because Police are helpless and useless except for when almost everyone agrees to play "nice"

Militant Islam doesn't play "nice". Notice in the past year, where street violence has either erupted or been threatened, that the Police will get agressive and threaten or kill Citizens when there are only a few, but when there are a few hundred, they suddenly get 'nicey-nicey'

They aren't stupid. When confronted by a mob, self preservation BETTER kick in

Media conspiracy (or is is truly idiocy?)

KEPR did a pitiful little bleep on this event along with a video, and the reporter basically was full of glowing compliments to the SWAT team for their "training exercise"

Abject stupidity? Victims of the Stockholm Syndrome? Willing participants?

All the above?

Back to the treasonous attempt to outlaw "assault weapons" this year. It IS treasonous to attempt to undermine the Constitutional limits placed upon Government by the PEOPLE and the people command"

THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

with the key concepts of "COMMAND" and "SHALL NOT"

If the reason (straw one at that) is that, specifically, AR15s are SSSOOOOOOOOO DANGEROUS, then the same firearm in the hands of the Police are just as dangerous, especially when its a GANG as was here.

CONSPIRACY is proven when there is no outcry against this. Far more dangerous are 10 JBTs with AR's, than a random incidence of ONE Citizen having one, because 10 can sling a hell of a lot more lead than 1.

Thus, we prove a conspiracy to overturn the Constitution, threaten and terrorize Citizens, and it needs to stop NOW before a REAL enemy shows up and takes advantage of the divide.

Yes, we know the deliberate, radical Leftist bias in Local Media, but, kids at KEPR (and I mean that literally, KEPR has children playing reporter) this is an ADULT TOPIC. An extremely serious one, not a load of horse shit like the cutsie little blonde last night interviewing the Cowboy about calf-roping. She asked about "tricks" for calf roping.

Honey child, thre are no TRICKS to life, its called EXPERIENCE and its clear no one in the media here has any.

We're talking about life and death topics, not recipies and social gatherings.

 

Taking advantage of division - Tactics

  What would I have done in the training exercise above? SOMETHING besides doing something STUPID like hold it in uptown RICHLAND and SETTING OFF GRENADES BESIDE A SYNAGOGUE AND DAYCARE CENTER IN TOWN.

  Tactics are about out-thinking the enemy, and again, no out thinking happened in this case, in fact, I didnt see any evidence of ANY thinking going on.

Real tactics here would rely on infra red cameras, not idiots slinging lead around and killing innocent - not even bystanders, but innocents in adjacent houses.

Three people. One for distraction, one for cover and one wiith a pistol and IR camera. UNDER THE FUCKING HOUSE, NOT LINING UP TO SHOOT 100 holes THROUGH IT.

No one inside is going to expect an attack from UNDERNEATH.

One outside making a racket to cover my noise. one armed on the perimeter as a guard to to cut loose if something goes wrong, and me crawling under the house at the foundation opening with a low powered flashlight, an IR camera and a 45. The perimeter has IR and tells me the latitude, I crawl under and mark the depth, and their ass is mine.

But I THINK...

Thats TATCICAL TRAINING. but, you see, MY way doesnt make great media coverage, doesnt terrorize the neighborhood, doesnt facliltate dressing and acting like MILITARY TROOPS. Modest dress and quietly disappearing under the house doesnt make good video footage.

MY way doesn't make a SHOW TO TERRORIZE CITIZENS. There is no overwhelming show of Jack Booted Operators to make the whole neighborhood afraid. No show for the cameras. No subtile implication of connecting this drill with military force overseas.

Just one round through the bad guy, and thats it. Or a tranquilizer dart.. With enough noise, its no problem to come up through the floor behind Z and scare the literal SHIT right out of him.

Just pop up and hit them with the stun gun. But OOPS, that doesnt push the "Jack Booted POLICE STATE BLOWING PEOPLE AWAY WITH GUNS" model.

Lots of creative ways that dont include GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERRORISM. MY WAY wouldnt put 10 man at risk of being killed, and no bullets go through the neighbors HOUSES.

Would there be danger to me in that scenario? Absolutely, but I have SURPRISE (and a hell of a lot of it) on my side. It's danger any way you cut it, but I want to be ahead of the curve, not standing there a TARGET.Anyone who is not prepared to face danger shouldn't put on a badge.

I don't want to make a scene, just give me a floor plan of the house (and I KNOW FOR A FACT the Richland FD trains with house plans) and you'll be surprised at the creative ways I find to pop up out of the floor behind Z and Part of "tactics" is not telling YOU how I'd do it...

Of course Im not going to give you any creative details, because that  ruins the elemt of SURPRISE.

 Instead of this "monkey f-king a football" (1970's North Dallas Forty movie) routine above, just toss in a tear gas cannister from the tank. Just pull it right up to the front door, yell DOMINOES DELIVERS!" and heave it in. End of story - unless Z is TRAINED..Oops, back to that "they aren't trained to handle a REAL threat" thing again.

  Remember Alien Gonzales (deliberate mis - spelling of his name)?

  Remember the jack booted thugs that broke into the apartment with weapons to take in a shivering scared little boy? Thats TERRORISM, folks.

They made sure the CAMERAS were rolling to maximise the effect of their TERRORIST drill.

9/21/2010 ===========

 

Don't believe in Santa Claus?

 You dont believe in Government sponsored terrorism? The Government is your god? Time for a new religion.

  One aspect of terrorism outside of just making people afraid (the immediate goal) is to effect social or political change (like Obamas covert terrorism in DC). Understand that Governments are all about both subjects and in the name of self preservation (survival instinct inherent in people which is transferred to their positions as Govt workers, to be specific) it is not only possible, but likely that Govt sponsored terrorism exists. It is more than proven that anti Government terrorism exists, said without proof.

Terrorism is about power and control and, again without proof, absolute power corrupts absolutely, and ALL governments get power-mad eventually, and in such a state, killing off a few Citizens is no great issue compared to keeping an insane Government in power. Just take the short list (Cuba, China, Russia,...)

Also factor in that the limits We the People COMMAND upon Government (the Bill of Rights is NOT written in an “asking niceley” mode, it uses “shall not” which is command language) have been eroded. Blatant, deliberate ignorance of the Second Amendment limitations stands as proof – NO INFRINGEMENT WHATSOEVER is permitted. It then stands to reason Government could use terrorism to further such goals- power grab.

 Now for PROOF that Government sponsored terrorism exists in the United States on behalf of even LOCAL GOVERNMENTS against Citizens:

Rock Hill to cut off water despite residents' pleas

  http://www.heraldonline.com/2010/09/15/2453400/rock-hill-to-cut-off-water-despite.html

By Jamie Self - jself@heraldonline.com

YORK COUNTY -- 

Rock Hill officials plan to turn off utility taps of county residents who refuse annexation by today's noon deadline despite being asked for an extension, city officials confirmed Tuesday.

Starting Monday the city plans to phase out service to residents who do not agree to annexation. Those who agree to annexation will not be affected, city officials said.

Property owners in three York County neighborhoods and along S.C. 161 are part of Rock Hill's annexation efforts to take control of commercial development along the S.C. 161 corridor..

Hired last week by the Miller Pond homeowners association, Attorney Jim Meggs of Columbia said he could likely get to the bottom of that question with more time.

But the city refused his request for a 30-day extension on the city's deadline.

"If I have adequate time to analyze where (residents) are, they're going to get the real skinny" on where they stand legally, Meggs said Tuesday. "But the city is not giving us the time for deliberation."...

As paying customers, some residents wonder why the city would turn off their water...

"We're scared," said David Grigg, president of the Miller Pond homeowners association. "I'd be lying if I said anything different."



You don't understand why they'd cut water off? ITS CALLED TERRORISM.

PLEAS? Citizens PLEADING WITH GOVERNMENT?

The Govt wants more power, namely, to annex (legally) the area for control and profit, tax base. They want MONEY. Problem is, water revenues aren't enough to fuel their money grab and the stated, dirty political/legal manipulation against CITIZENS by little dictators in Government indicate a personal power/revenge M.O.

So, they employ GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERRORISM, WHICH WORKED ACCORDING TO GRIGGS STATEMENT:

"We're scared," said David Grigg,

Not that pressure is enough, but dirty legal manuvering is also employed AGAINST CITIZENS WHO OWN THE CITY.

“This is just passive means to coerce compliance” you ask? NO, THE LIVES OF THESE PEOPLE ARE BEING THREATENED, BECAUSE PEOPLE CANNOT LIVE WITHOUT WATER.

  Don't think this is an isolated incident, some UN backed, US Government terrorist group tried this with the Farmers at Klamath Falls, Oregon and damned near started a shooting war. The water was turned off to their farms, and the farmers went and forcibly turned it back on, which is what MUST happen here.

Now that you're “eyes wide open”

  Here's how it unfolds that this so called SWAT drill was not only DOMESTIC GOVERNMENT SPONSORED TERRORISM, but with a twist you may not expect, THEY INTEND TO KILL THEIR OWN POLICE OFFICERS.

Read me again, I didn't say “ accidentally or otherwise kill a Citizen” I said THEY PLAN TO DELIBERATLY EXECUTE THEIR OWN POLICE EMPLOYEES.

I have shown proof that this outing was NOT TACTICAL TRAINING because there were no tactics employed. Standing there on the porch like Trick or Treaters with a knock-warrant (that could have been a scenario there, they stood at the door for a time instead of rushing it and breaking it down, so lets assume knock warrant) IS NOT TEACHING TACTICAL LESSONS, ITS ROUTINE POLICE ACTIVITY. This PROVES DECEIT.

Yes, wide eyed fools participating in this so called SWAT training exercise – YOUR Employer is setting YOU up to be KILLED in a real tactical situation due to lack of TRAINING – its DELIBERATE and they have a DELIBERATE, SYSTEMATIC GOAL IN MIND.

Waco II is the goal and YOU are being set up as both PAWN and VICTIM to accomplish EXACTLY the same outcome as was in the Waco Murders of the Branch Davidians.

That it can happen again is proven in that it happened once.

If you want proof of what happened at Waco (not the lies the Leftist media spread about the events) then hunt down the original tapes and see the following that unfolded.

The Waco Murders started with a false claim of a non existent threat. Straw Man. They created a Straw Man, then burned him to death, ALONG WITH WOMEN AND CHILDREN

The Branch Davidians were MURDERED for their RELIGIOUS beliefs. The story was that they were dangerous because they had GUNS. Imagine that – people with GUNS IN AMERICA!

  Just as it is a United Nations goal to take over and re-distribute water from Klamath Falls Farmers, it is also their goal through the Small Arms Treaty to DISARM YOU.

The ad hominem attack started with the word “COMPOUND” The intent of this attack was to recall the Jonestown massacre by Jim Jones and transfer that TERROR onto the Davidians. Had the Davidians taken their guns out and shot up Waco or harmed anyone? NO.

This group was demonized into being some dangerous religious cult (again to re-use the Jones tragedy) when, in fact, they were NOTHING else than Independent Seventh Day Adventists that wanted to be LEFT THE HELL ALONE. The residents of Waco never had any problems with them!

So, the Government sponsored Media phonied up claims that “children were being harmed” despite no evidence of this (I guess it must have been psychological harm? They werent being indoctrinated in the State Religion?) and that Koresh had fanatic religious views including that of his being some sort of Messiah figure (common in cults). To push their lies, they had to deliberately take Koresh's comments out of context – I heard their lies, I heard his original statements and I know EXACTLY what they taught and believed. The Davidians were lied to, and about, from every angle to phoney- up a TERRORIST situation.

So now a corrupt Government has set up a Straw Man to then attack with police power.

It doesn't take that level of conspiracy, the scenario could be a simple domestic dispute with a gun.

As Waco unfolded, so can a future event.

The problem at Waco started with gunfire, as obvious to anyone seeing the tapes, ALL the shooting was from OUTSIDE, as there were NO bullets landing in the dirt as if fired inside-out. The Police were doing all the shooting, from outside to inside. This was used as an excuse, along with panic, excitement and POOR TRAINING to escalate to a full scale assault on WOMEN AND CHILDREN HUDDLED IN AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE AREA, UNARMED. Thats where their BURNED BODIES were found after the Governors MILITARY TANK SET THE “COMPOUND” ON FIRE. It has a flame thrower CLEARLY visible in the video.

SO, the JBT;s invade the so – called “compound" and the 5 go on the roof, and 2 (or 3) are MURDERED BY THEIR OWN. There clearly was no time for the two (or three) that entered the second-story window to escape the gun fire from their comrades. They were killed by their own.

To summarize to this point, a bunch of poorly trained SWAT operatives phoney up a threat based on the desire of a Corrupt Government to first control, and when that fails, murder Citizens and the lack of training, or worse, causes 'friendly fire' deaths.

Once the Straw Man was set ablaze by false claims of gunfire from inside, the Government pretended it had all right to attack ILLEGALLY BY USING A MILITARY TANK. All reason and Law set aside in an “end justifies the means" assault and MURDER OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN HUDDLED IN AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE AREA.

  Now, with those events as an initial assumption, heres where Richlands Dog and Pony show could go down the same path.

  1. Threat, credible or not, they are easy to invent and blow out of proportion, especially with the bleeding heat, crying wolf Media in Dry Cities,

  2. Government desire for power and control. The Traitors on the City Council and Traitorous City Attorney deliberately ignoring both the WA Constitution and WA Preemption Law, and deliberately continuing in the same, are proof of that claim. (see the blog front page for more on the topic of REICHlands Un Constitutional and ILLEGAL ordinance against firearms)

  3. History of Police murdering Citizens and getting away with it (recent incident in WA State of shooting and killing an Indian man holding a knife presented as proof),

  4. Poorly trained so-called “SWAT team” (poor training evidenced above),

  5. (heres where it goes badly wrong) DELIBERATELY POOR TRAINING. It wont do to have them well trained, as – remember- these ones on the SWAT team ARE STILL CITIZENS with families, churches, dogs, cars, homes...Realize that there are TwO components to training, the TRAINERS, and those being TRAINED,

  6. Violation of Law in employing military force in the US (axe to grind, ass to cover),

  7. A bunch of Citizens to terrorize.



How it unfolds

  Back to "let's pretend." A domestic dispute is called in at the house on Thayer. OR THE HOUSE BEHIND YOURS. Yes, it was empty, unoccupied, on the date in question, but were making up a scenario based on evidence and reason.

   Domestics are among the worst situation that the Police have to deal with, bad situation, risk to all, rarely do they get settled peacably, especially where drugs a/o alcohol are involved. I talked with one cop on duty at a domestic in Ohio, he was LITERALLY ON THE EDGE OF TEARS because of the situation, repeated, nasty domestic problem.

Did you catch that? Literally on the edge of tears? Re-read 5.) above. Police are people too.

Back to the initial premise, Government sponsored, created, caused TERRORISM. “Terrorism” is making people afraid especially with the use of force to accomplish political CHANGE.

 Heard that word lately - CHANGE? When someone in GIVErnment wants to CHANGE people that dont want CHANGE, we have  a serious problem.

The domestic gets violent and gunfire is heard inside. Now everyone is in danger, presumably. The SWAT team is called in with their 45s and AR15s and bulletproof vests. They trained in the example above, and as we train, so we act.

They (SWAT) are being, right then, SET UP AS DELIBERATE TARGETS. A couple of them walk up to the front door, and someone inside opens-fire and kills a few of them. Thats EXACTLY what happened here recently with two Sheriffs Deputies killed by a man with a shotgun, if I recall correctly.

Here's where the Devil is playing his hand.

The SWAT members were killed, deliberately NOT ONLY BY THE RESIDENT/OCCUPANT, but BY HIS TRAINERS. He was deliberately poorly trained to go into a situation and get killed.

WHY? To further TERRORISM and its a PERFECT SETUP AND COVERUP, BECAUSE NOTHING "OFFICIAL" WAS DONE. They are sacrificed through very SUBTILE ERRORS OF OMISSION ON THE PART OF THEIR TRAINER(S).

It's not enough justification for escalation of the Government controlled Police State to just have ordinary, random crime/shootings/stabbings/robberies.... and dealing with them out of the Press. A Straw Man is needed, and that is forced. Manipulated events fueled by a deliberately radical Media, as in Waco, is the goal.

Once poorly trained, these SWAT members are targets. Once killed in the line of duty, they become a rallying cry around “more Government power” because whats worse than killing a cop”??

I'll tell you what's worse, TERRORISM is worse. Terrorism sponsored of, by, and for Criminals in Government that is supposed to evolve from, and answer to the PEOPLE.

This unfolds as a “win win” situation for Corrupt Government bent on totalitarian power over Citizens. The unfortunate execution of one of their cops, which they deliberately orchestrated, just gives them more power, in their 'end justifies the means' mentality, to do anything they please to terrorize the Community.

And don't tell me it can't happen, for thats EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED AT WACO, TEXAS and EXACTLY THE WAY IT HAPPENED.


Now it gets worse

When a couple SWAT members are killed at the front door, then the rest of the Troupe attack with their AR15s a-blazing. Realizing the rounds will go through three houses, how many – not bystanders- but innocents not connected in any way, living two or three houses away are injured or killed in the assault?

HOW MANY CHILDREN IN THE DAYCARE ACROSS THE STREET ARE KILLED? Its always about the CHILDREN when the foaming at the mouth Media play their games, so thats the MO here. Good for one, good for the other. 

More terrorism. This Public SWAT display was done exactly for that reason. Its YOUR house the bullets may go through, your children that may be killed or injured.

And now its time for YOU to put a stop to it before YOU become their target.

 EDIT 1/10/10

 Exhibit B in GOVERNMENT EVIL - HITLER/ SS type medical experiments conducted by the evil bastards in the US Govt:

 http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101001/ts_nm/us_usa_guatemala_experiment

U.S. apologizes for syphilis experiment in Guatemala

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States apologized on Friday for an experiment conducted in the 1940s in which U.S. government researchers deliberately infected Guatemalan prison inmates, women and mental patients with syphilis.

In the experiment, aimed at testing the then-new drug penicillin, inmates were infected by prostitutes and later treated with the antibiotic.

 -----------So, with this magnitude of evil, do you REALLY think a little Govt sponsored TERRORISm is a big deal to them?

 

NOW READ THIS:

 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/as_afghanistan

Afghan starts to close private security firms


KABUL, Afghanistan – The Afghan government said Sunday it has started dissolving private security firms in the country by taking steps to end the operations of eight companies, including the firm formerly known as Blackwater and three other international contractors.

"We have very good news for the Afghan people today," presidential spokesman Waheed Omar told reporters in the capital. "The disbanding of eight private security firms has started."

Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced in August that private security contractors would have to cease operations by the end of the year — wiping out an industry with tens of thousands of guards who protect military convoys, government officials and businesspeople.

Some security contractors have been criticized for operating more like private militias, and the government said it could not have armed groups that were independent of the police or military forces.

And the difference between "private security firms" (armed militia of ex military soldiers) and this SWAT team is WHAT?

 YOU answer that one.


Posted by Dave at 11:22 PM PDT
Updated: Sunday, 3 October 2010 9:05 AM PDT
Response to Seattle PIs coverup of police MURDERING people in the streets

 Police Chief overhauls department after Native American shooting

By CHRIS GRYGIEL
SEATTLEPI.COM STAFF

Following the controversial fatal shooting of a Native American man, Seattle Police Chief John Diaz on Wednesday announced an overhaul of his department...

Investigators say officer Ian D. Birk, 27, shot 50-year-old John T. Williams Aug. 30. Police say Williams was armed with a knife when he was shot four times after the officer ordered him to drop the weapon. However some witnesses have said Williams, a Native American wood carver, did not appear threatening. His family has said he was deaf in one ear.

 =========================

Lets sort through the LIES, ad hominems and red herrings littering THIS story (not that the PI is doing it, they are being fed a proverbial crock of crap and arent QUESTIONING it.)

1.) The WA CONSTITUTION DOES NOT allow "armed bodies of corporate men" meaning POLICE DEPARTMENTS TO HAVE GUNS
Article I, Sect 24, WA Constitition states:

"SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men."

http://www.leg.wa.gov/lawsandagencyrules/pages/constitution.aspx

police Departments as subordinates to CITY CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PERMITTED WEAPONS

2.) "Police Chief overhauls department after Native American shooting"

The connundrum of colliding LEFTIST idealogies, the Police State murdering CITIZENS, vs the Leftist sponsored racism
that favors this or that group to further political power. In this case, the State favors committing TERRORISM
against Citizens (cops murdering people in the streets) because it creates more power. Only when things
become so bad thy cannot be hidden any longer, and this collision among leftist idealogies ocurrs do they
come ouf of hiding to at least phoney up a "solution"

3.) Here we go with the lies:

"Nine commanders will assume a new job to help build the community, reduce fear in the city and fight crime, Diaz said."

NONE of those are the job of LAW ENFORCEMENT. "Community building" is socialist social infiltration, Alinsky - style. "Reduce Fear" in the context of "fear as a result of a police shooting (murderr in cold blood) proves my previous point about them CREATING the fear in the first place. "Crime fighting" is for Batman and Robin, the cops job is LAW ENFORCEMENT and nothing else, red-herring-ed or not.

4.) "Authorities also said after Seattle police complete their own probe into last month's fatal shooting, they are prepared to allow two outside police agencies to conduct a "peer review.""

RED HERRING, the process should be PROSECUTION FOR MURDER. Wanna start more INNER CITY RIOTS? Keep it up...

5.) "Tim Burgess, chairman of the Public Safety committee and a former police officer, had called for an independent probe of the Williams shooting."

Red herring, EVASIVE. The WILLIAMS MURDER. They love to play semantic infiltration. Murder with a GUN IS NOT justified under WA Law against someone non threatening with a KNIFE.

Gun to a knife fight? What a crock.

6.) "Diaz said Assistant Chief Nick Metz has been promoted to deputy chief of operations and community relations, tasked with building relationships."

How about LAW ENFORCEMENT instead of "relationship building"? This is Law enforcement, NOT BANKING. This is about MURDER, not a ladies tea party.

7.) "Investigators say officer Ian D. Birk, 27, shot 50-year-old John T. Williams Aug. 30. Police say Williams was armed with a knife when he was shot four times after the officer ordered him to drop the weapon."

Murder, cold blooded, premeditated. Cops are supposed to be TRAINED to DISARM people, more than one cant use PEPPER SPRAY or STUN GUNS TO TAKE A KNIFE AWAY? No, this is DELIBERATE MURDER TO CAUSE TERROR.

FOUR TIMES? Cant shoot to WOUND? Cant shoot him in the shoulder or arm which is holding the knife? No, not when the goal is STATE SPONSORED TERRORISN.

8.) "Authorities said Williams had "a decades-long history of misdemeanors and gross misdemeanor violations." Birk, a two-year veteran, was not equipped with a Taser."

PROVING my above point that this is all a COVERUP. Willfuo, wanton, premeditated TERRORISM.

WNY NOT equipped with a Tazer? That doesnt allow them to commit VIOLENT MURDER IN THE STREETS TO INVOKE TERRORISM.

9.) "On Wednesday Diaz said the department would increase its number of Tasers; there are now about 300 available for use by the approximatley 1,250 officers in the city."

Evasive, the quetion at hand is MURDER, and "tasers" which lead to MORE violence is not the answer, its evasive to ignore STATE SPONSORED MURDER.

10.) "Diaz and other police officials said de-escalation training, in which officers are taught to tamp down a volatile situation, would be reemphasized."

Not good enough. There was a recent story of a soldier who went off psych and the military diffused the situation WITHOUT MURDERING HIM. HE HAD A GUN. They talked him down.

Whats needed is to get off their lazy asses and take MANDATORY MARTIAL ARTS TRAINING, and I dont mean some  beginners course, black level in Judo for a MINIMUM requirement.

11.) Back to the LIES:

""What it really comes down to is skillful decision-making," Diaz said at a City Hall news conference. "Our job is to bring peace. Our job is to make things better.""

No, your job is LAW ENFORCEMENT. No, it doesbnt come down to a red herring term called "skillful decision making" its called NOT MURDERING PEOPLE IN THE STREETS.

12.) "but stressed accountability was his top concern."

WHEN MURDER IS IGNORED, it becomes the TOP CONCERN, not a$$ covering.

11.) ""We will make a decision and we will be held responsible. I will be held responsible," McGinn said."

WA Law fixes a PENALTY FOR KILLING WITH A GUN, SOMEONE ARMED WITH A KNIFE. Until hes prosecuted and tried for his CRIMES, this is all lies and coverup.

yes, the WA Constitution provides some immunity for Municipalities, but NOT FOR MURDER. 

IMPORTANT PS:

"Crime fighting" implies STOPPING crime before it happens. There is NO legal authority in this Nation to do that. that implies TOTAL STATE CONTROL OF PEOPLES LIVES to "prevent" them from doing this or that which may or may not be illegal.

Cops have ONE job and ONE ONLY - to enforce codified LAW and do so AFTER THE FACT, after a crime or other violation HAS BEEN committed.

The man who was MURDERED had violated NO LAW.

  PSS Sorry, but theres too much thats critical herre. "Preventing crime" is how COMMUNISM works. Control the citizenry, RUSSIAN STYLE.


Posted by Dave at 10:58 PM PDT
Updated: Wednesday, 15 September 2010 1:56 PM PDT
Tuesday, 31 August 2010
TCH Editorial Bias and LIES

Let me analyse the outright LIES here from the Tri City Herald that I just received in re their refusal to publsh a LTE on KNDUs deliberate bias and misinformation regarding ILLEGAL MEXICANS.

 

Heres the response I just received from them, followed by analysis by someone who knows Federaly Licensed Broadcast Stations like the back of my hand, (me) including the laws and contracts they operate by.

 Analysis by law, business and FACT, not "FEELINGS" which are al the TCH can cite.

And before reading this disgrace of a response from a biased Paper, realize that Bobs last LTE about the local hospital system was one they REFUSED to publish until some "influential local Citizens leaned on them" (paraphrased, but you get the point)

you see, when the Media is in bed with local Govt and Corporations instead of taking any interest in the affairs and rights of the PEOPLE, this kind of CORRUPTION is the result.

 Pour vous, Ms Norman

(ps off to an errrand, back later to esplain

 

=========================

FW: Yes or no?
     
     
     


|

letters

 to me
  
Thanks for your letter but I’m sorry it is our policy not to publish letters that we feel expose only one side of personal, legal, or business matters. We cannot undertake the kind of investigation such letters would demand before being published.

The letters to the editor portion of our editorial page is for discussion of public issues, not private grievances.

Sincerely,
Shelly Norman
Letters to the editor
Tri-City Herald
582-1470




  In re. KNDUs interviw of Jim Hazen, Broetje farm manager, in the video  "Migrant workers vital to the economy" who was attempting to use semantic infiltration to redefine Illegal Aliens as "migrants" where the meaning of "migrant" was subtly changed to 'not moving" or a local context, implying that since they lived in 'permanent housing' they were no longer "migrants."

 "Migrant" refers to travel from Mexico to the US within the scope of Immigration Law, and is not subject to subversive redefinition for PROFITING IN MEXICAN SLAVE TRADE. That's substantially what it is; If they are not Illegal aliens, then pay them enough to afford to live like the rest of us.

This is a subversive attempt at selling the idea of "amnesty for criminal aliens," to normalize criminal activity.

This is a similar lie to "the economy cannot survive without illegal aliens working for peanuts." Good for HIS economy, yes, but an economic disaster for the United States.

Jim, I'll think of you next time I hear of "migrant crime."

 This deceitful Media is'nt in the interest of the viewing Public for which KNDU's broadcast license is issued. Off to file a complaint against their broadcast license with the FCC!

------ End of Forwarded Message
 
|
 
  
well of course, the TCH HAS THE SAME DELIBERATE BIAS towards Mexicans.

KNDU misleading the Public IS NOT A PRIVATE ISSUE. Its PUBLIC UNDER FEDERAL LAW.

Your refusal, of course, will be published to my Email list and Blog.

Guess why i dont read your rag?
- Show quoted text -

 ===================

And now, the insightful and sometime inciteful analysis by an EXPERT, not someone peddling a Left Wing bias.

1.) The issue is a TV station, KNDU, broadcasting DELIBERATELY misleading, unbalanced and biased "news" which intended to mislead people into agreeing with Amnesty for Criminal Aliens. After all, thats what it all boils down to. The Left (soon to be the Left Behind) are desperate to stay in power, and theyll do ANYTHING including violate law to stay there.

All TV and Radio stations in the US, except for some low power or "pirate" stations" are Federally Licensed under CFR 47 (commonly called FCC Law). Much/most of this Law comes from/after International Treaties on the use of airwaves.

The Station is granted broadcast authority under FCC to SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST, NOT THEIR OWN OR OF THEIR ADVERTISERS.

Newspapers, on the other hand, are not under such laws and therefore, and thereafter, are free to sink to the bottom of the cesspool as has the TCH.

  Broadcast stations can LOSE THEIR LICENSES for pulling such shennanigans.  Expecially if people compiain, as hopefully you will over this kind of deliberate violation fo their grant of License.

2.) I sent a Letter to the Editor of the TCH and they refused to publish it, citing the following excuses:

 a.) "Thanks for your letter but I’m sorry it is our policy not to publish letters that we feel"

"Feel" is the usual excuse Liberals use when they have no grounds to argue on. NO ONE in a legitimate Management process relies on "feel" especially, for example, in the age of ISO Certification, where management process is carefully documented based on meaningful metrics of business operation and success.

'Feel?" I dont FEEL like reading the Herald because its obviously and plainly BIASED towards the whacko Left. As above, Bob related to me that they tried to cover up his LTE regarding the hospitals (despite the fact hes an absolute EXPERT on the subject) until some prominent locals let them know that wasnt acceptable.

b.)  "expose only one side of" This is the Media game, create DIVISION to have sides to exploit, When the issue is crystal clear, they dont want to hear it, because they cant employ their divide and conquer game. I AM an expert on the subject and no one likes an expert exposing the lies and deceit.

Arent most LTEs discussing ONE SIDE of an issue? Dont THEY usually have a lop-sided view on things?

c.)  "personal, legal, or business matter"

Personal? No, under Federal Law, ITS A PUBLIC MATTER just as the TV stations license renewal is partly based on PUBLIC COMMENT during the Comment Period before re-issue of the License.

d.) "We cannot undertake the kind of investigation"

When there are TWO excuses, we know alls rotten is not in Denmark. Why dont they have the time? Who says itll take much more "time" than viewing the KNDU video? I can explain the Federal Law to them in a few minutes.

REAL newspapers and TV stations like those in Denver can find the "time."

e.) "The letters to the editor portion of our editorial page is for discussion of public issues, not private grievances."

 Bald faced lie. Threre was NO mention in my LTE of any personal angle except being a member of the Viewing Public seeing deliberately misleading reporting on a PUBLIC BROADCAST STATION.

Lies, on top of lies to cover up the illegal activities of local Farms to hire CRIMINAL ALIENS.

PS Notice I mentioned "laws and contracts" in re a broadcast station. Realise that TV and radio stations live and die on advertiser dollars and what advertisers DO NOT want to hear is that We the People dont want to view/listen to the media outlet in question.

If they ignore you, rest assured, their advertisers won't. 

PS Here's REAL NEWSPAPER REPORTING. Exposing the LIES of Climate Change: 

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/196642 


Posted by Dave at 4:06 PM PDT
Updated: Saturday, 13 November 2010 10:34 PM PST
Monday, 19 July 2010
re illegal 2010 census, letters from OMB and Census
Topic: General politics

Below are links to scans of letters from OMB and Census, carefully EVADING the fact that the 2010 Census is ILLEGAL.

THEY HAVE ADMITTED THAT CENSUS IS USING A BOGUS "OMB CONTROL NUMBER"

Why? No, Im not asking "why they are evasive?' I'm asking why does an Administration which promised to be soooooo transparent conduct such illegal activities

 Thanks to Doc HAstings Office(s) for getting such prompt repiles (Census has replied, they have not responded to the questions, but evaded them)

Now its time to get the 2010 Census put on OMBs list of collections that are invalid. They have such a thing, you know...

 Letter 1          Letter2               Letter3            Letter 4        Letter 5           Letter   6

 


Posted by Dave at 8:42 AM PDT
Updated: Monday, 19 July 2010 8:49 AM PDT
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
a treasonous little thing called "private property rights"
Topic: Constitutional

You all know the scam - "Party A cannot posess a firearm because he is on Party B's property and Party B has the right to regulate what goes on on his own property."

 Now, its taken considerable time to wrap my mind around this delectable fraud, because its insidious, tricky and fraudulent at best. It came to me whilst washing the driveway. I wash my vehicle in my own driveway and I DARE the WA State Car Wash Police to come and get me.

What a F-king STUPID LAW. (PS I neutralize the oils and etc that come off the vehicle with Super Clean- what hits the driveway is not oil...its bio-broken down by whatever chemical process...)

 1.) Someone underline what part of the US Constitution AND the WA Constitution grants private property rights.

 THAY AIN'T NONE. (thats pronounced "thay'ntnun") And, PS, the WA Constitution incorporates the US Constitution as LAW OF THE STATE.

2.) Someone underline what part of said Constitutions speaks of the enumerated Right to Bear Arms.

THEY BOTH DO.

Houston, we have a problem, but the root of the problem is not obvious. It's taken me a few months to really un-veil the SCAM here.

Party B only has the indirect right to posess property (land, for example) through the general provision of "pursuit of happiness."B MUST HAVE PUBLIC PERMISSION TO POSESS LAND. That Deed B is so proud of...

BOTH parties have the ENUMERATED RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, and there IS NO DEED TO A FIREARM, AND NEITHER GOVT OR PUBLIC SHARE ANY OWNERSHIP RIGHT IN IT.

Put THAT in your smoke and pipe it!

There's something wrong when B not only does not want said Right for himself, but wants to bar A from enjoying it. B must be smoking something...

 Again (TALKING POINT) ITS B'S RIGHT ALSO.

 But B is on a power trip. B feels insecure of himself, so he inevitably petitions Government (which HAS NO RIGHTS, only RESPONSABILITIES) to wage war on A to deprive A of his Rights.

Whose side does a Corrupt Government take? The one that benefits Government, of course, as it is the irresistable nature of Man to be corrupt and favor himself.

The Corrupt Government takes B's side for several corrupt reasons:

a.) Government pretends to have power whether favoring A, B, or none of the above.

b.) Government is comprised of Citizens who too often, knowing it or not, are on a personal power trip,  money, vainglory or both, and what better way to fill that void than judging among the masses and making laws? More fun yet, try to RULE OVER THEM.

c.) a Corrupt and UnConstitutional Government does not like being inhibited by the Constitution(s) so it welcomes the chance to use whatever Straw Man happens along to suit its own power trip purposes.

d.) Government wants MONEY. Which Party, A or B,does Corrupt Government benefit more from- Party A who pays a one time SALES TAX on a firearm, or Party B who pays YEARLY PROPERTY TAXES?

 Now, youre onto the SCAM.

 So, when Party B, with un-civil motives, comes a-petitioning Government to secure his own property (so he says) Government obviously favors whom is FUNDING ITS MEMBERS SALARIES.

Party A has the superior Right to Bear Arms. Party B's assertion that he has the right to prohibit A from his Constitutional Posession of Private Property, SOLELY BECAUSE A IS ON B's PROPERTY, is a LIE and a FRAUD, for A's posession of his own lawful property, whether physically on B's premesis or not, is neither affected by B's rights nor has any effect on B, or B's property, 

The two rights have no relationship.

If A goes marauding and shoots B;s property up, then B has a legitimate right to seek damages from A, but that is an ACTION beyond B's RIGHT to real property. But, that is the other part of the SCAM - that B, in coercion with a Corrupt Government, can pre-empt A from doing some imagined wrong.

THAT IS HOW  COMMUNIST GOVERNMENTS WORK. Thats not Constitutional representation, its totalitarian control.

Party B is LYING when he asserts that infringement on A's Rights somehow secures his property, for what better security than to have a HUNDRED ARMED FRIENDS is there?

When's the last time you heard of a robbing or other ill on a GUN RANGE? I'll dare-say it's never happened.

The idiot that is B does not realize that in the process, hes giving up OWNERSHIP OF HIS OWN PROPERTY TO THE GOVERNMENT. Let Fool B try not paying the PROPERTY TAXES that B pays to have Government hear his treasonous petition.

And theres Greedy Corrupt Government ready to take that money. And as it goes in this State, throw it down a rat hole.

 Compare this to the rotten, money grubbing group called the "NRA" (acronym for "in it for ourselves") playing dog an pony with a photo of NRA folk along with Law Enforcement proudly heralding "shalll issue" with regard to Concealed Carry.

Of course this is an un-Constitutional SCAM on the part of Corrupt Government, corrupt Law Enforcement (the incorporated law of this State is "shall not be infringed") and greedy money grubbers at NRA, because CONCEALED CARRY PERMITS ARE FORBIDDEN BY BOTH CONSTITUTIONS.

Of course, NRA is so proud to have the Police on board and of course the PDs are glad to share in the power grab. A Dog and Pony show cant go on without both Dog and Pony, now can it?

Sure, power hungry PDs might prefer "may issue," but if "shall issue" prevails, there is still the process that leaves them in control, or so they think.

...not failing to forget for a moment that said PD SWORE TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION, did they not?

 I like Kennesaw GA's position better - "shall posess" which HAS ELIMINATED CRIME IN KENNESAW.

 Now, lets bring it home. I wrote to our So Called Representative Delvin about doing similar to VA in repealing firearms laws. He promised to meet with us over the last break.

Havent heard a peep from him, even though I gave him a copy of the Email in which he promised at the last Constituent meeting.

Dont believe for a minute that EITHER party is anything but a SCAM.

Hell, with broken promises like that, I may as well vote Democrat.


Posted by Dave at 6:03 PM PDT
Updated: Wednesday, 23 June 2010 6:51 PM PDT
Monday, 17 May 2010
WSBA Agrees with Lawbreaking City Attorney - refuses to investigate Grievance
Topic: WA Illegal

Jut in- final response from the WSBA refusing to do anything about the clearly unlawful acts of Lampson and the City of REICHland in re their ILLEGAL, PREEMPTED AND REPEALED City Ordinance banning weapons in Amon Park.

 Not that I expected a CABAL to do anything but cover its own ass.  Theyre all in it together, including the PRO 2A ATTORNEYS in WA State WHO LIED THROUGH THEIR TEETH TO ME. The So called NRA Attorneys who refused to take action. The so called "Washington State Gun Lawyer" who lied to me, stating he would take this on, then later refused to when he found out I wanted to take action with TEETH in it.

 The Bar has covered up Lampsons illegal and improper (under the Court Rules) actions in aiding his Client (Richland) in making the ILLEGAL, PREEMPTED and REPEALED Ordinance.

He, as Respondant, did not respond to the (charges, accusation, allegation, use whichever word is appropriate) that I made, rather, employed red herring to evade them, by simple citing the history of the matter and ignoring the pointed, documented allegations I made with clear references to the Courts Rules which hold those actions as improper.

Is it not unconscionable for an Attorney to aid his Client in doing something clearly FORBIDDEN by law?

 Apparently in WA it isn't.

  Ive scanned and posted all the WSBA documents on the front page here:

http://second-amendment.tripod.com

for your response of "did you expect anything else"

To wit I reply as Ecclesiastes wrote:

"Don't be surpised when one is corrupt, and the one above him helps cover it up."

I'm not...


Posted by Dave at 2:50 PM PDT
Friday, 14 May 2010
More ILLEGAL crap from Census
Topic: General politics

http://www.federalnewsradio.com/?nid=15&sid=1957146 

"We are watching what's happening in other countries and I think this is going to be a key tool to measure the American public for years on in," (Groves)

What kind of Gibberish is this? What other Countries are doing is irrelavent to the US Census, US LAW IS RELEVANT. Further, the two partsof the sentence do not refer to each other, how is "measuring the American public" predicated on "whats happening in other Countries"? The two have no relationship.

There is no legal basis  in USC for "measuring" anyone. This is the semantic infiltration game, change the meaning of words, or make up new phrases with new meanings. 

http://www.census.gov/acs/www/

So Census thinks were REQUIRED to respond to something called "American Community SURVEY?"

 Required to respond to a population Census EVERY YEAR?

NOT UNDER LAW, WERE NOT!

The population census for enumeration is only authorized every 10 years. NOT every year. 

"

  • is an on-going survey
  • is sent to a sample of the population
  • tells us what the population looks like and how it lives
  • helps communities determine where to locate services and allocate resources"

If its only sent to a sample of the population, then its not a Census of Enumeration and my response is:

 "Get lost" 

i emailed the reporter/story author and posted this in response to the article: 

THIS IS ILLEGAL ( New Entry )
Census is authorized by Congress under USC TItle 13. Read it: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode13/usc_sup_01_13.html (or search for U.S.C. Title 13) There is NO legal authorization for a "survey." It is a CENSUS. There is NO legal authorization for a population census every YEAR. It is 10 YEARS. There is NO legal requirement for a Citizen to respond to ACS. Read the Title, where is it? Not only is this illegal, but the 2010 Census is illegal, because although Office of Management and Budget (OMB) did issue a Control Number to Census, CENSUS IS NOT USING IT ON THE FORM/house to house survey, therefore the collection is ILLEGAL. Census is spreading false information as to the penalty for not responding, Director Groves, in a letter to Congressman Doc Hastings, stated it was $5000. Law says "not more than $100" This false information also appears on the Census website. Census is asking questions of RACE which are not permitted by Law. It is irrelavent to a Census of Enumeration whether one is Hispanic. Unless one wants to make the Census RACIST. 2 questions: 1.) Why? 2.) Why arent the Media investigating this?

 

Heres the game. Straw man diversion.

1. Fact: there are problems with collecting the Census. Yep, probably the same problems as in many other past Censii (is that the correct Latin plural?) 

2.) diversion on a false premise (red herring) the Census is flawed so we need to abandon it in favor of the Internet.

the premise is deliberately flawed because all it takes is to put the Census form ON LINE as FILLABLE. Its ALREADY ON LINE AS AN IMAGE.

3. And then the pivot play- proceeding from the false assertion the Census is flawed and must be abandoned, the pivot is to say that since ACS is internet friendly, then will use ACS.

 Problems: 

1.) There is no reason to abandon the Census due to collection problems. If so, its ILLEGAL. There is no legal authority for collecting a "survey."

2.) The current Census does not reach every house, it hasnt for years. Rush said he has never received a form. Many households do not have internet.

3.) How to put it on-line securely?

4.) The Census data is only to be transmitted to the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. Look at ACS on line, does it appear they are transmittng it to the President? 

 


Posted by Dave at 8:22 AM PDT
Updated: Friday, 14 May 2010 8:54 AM PDT
Thursday, 13 May 2010
Your assignment in Constutional study- read this crap and analyse it
Topic: Constitutional

The Tri Cities herald is foaming at the mouth with its Communist Big Govt  drivel again under the guise of a Public Forum. Of course, people with empty heads full of opinions who want to look relevant will chime in with all sorts of Un Constitutional and illegal, immoral, irrational trash as they always do.

 Read it, if you can keep from puking. Ill post the "low-lights"

  http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2010/05/12/1012171/editorial-preview-may-13-19.html?mi_pluck_action=comment_submitted&qwxq=9393625#Comments_Container

 

Editorial Preview — May 13-19


Our frustrations with the functioning of government at various levels is providing plenty of fodder for editorial topics in the coming week. We’ve also noticed some positive developments worthy of comment. As always, you’re encouraged to jump into the conversation.

Benton County commissioners — We’re writing this one for Thursday. Before deciding major policy issues, why don’t’ the commissioners take a deliberate approach that includes full participation of stakeholders and the public? On both the potential fairgrounds sale and the future of the bi-county health district, they’re failing the engage in the discussions needed to make informed decisions....<snip>

Attorney General mulls Miranda rights revision — The war on terror is different than any other war in our history. We’re not fighting a nation but an ideology, so the old rules don’t apply. How can we rewrite the standards for terrorist suspects to serve both our national security and our democratic ideals?

 ================================

What a load of goat roping! This crap is known as "straw argument" and isnt asking questions, its deceitful and evasive tactics to plant ideas in peoples minds. It's called DIALOGING TO CONCENSUS. Never mind that: 

a.) most of them dont have minds of their own or they wouldnt fall into traps like this in the first place

b.) the crap theyre spreading is UNCONSTITUTIONAL 

Read the Wiki on "straw argument" then read the editorial. Then read Miranda and the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution. Yes, Miranda was a ruling, but its based in the Fifth Amendment. ALL LIMITATIONS ON GOVERNMENT ARE. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man 

Here are my responses, of course, they'll delete them. I've been kicked off The TCH, WSJ and Reuters websites for my Free Speech.  Yes, the Tricycle Herald retaliates against those who speak out against them like any other good Communist-sympathizing organization does. I posted those details earlier on this Blog.

==============================

 

"The issue of Miranda rights for terrorists is taking an early lead in the polling. We're guessing the interest expressed here is representative of the broader community"

That is a "straw argument" thats borderline treasonous:

In violation of presumption of innocence
Generally contrary to the Fifth Amendment and specifically Miranda.

RIGHTS are not something that Government grants. They are reserved to the People, not Govt, corporations, stakeholders, NGOs or newspapers.

Wiki defines straw argument as based on fallacy based on misrepresentation which, here, is a deliberately false initial premise that ACCUSED terrorists have no/diminished rights based on an ACCUSATION.

They are not terrorists until proven so by a COURT."

There are two "straws" here (false/misleading arguments)

1.) "The war on terror is different than any other war in our history"

Off topic (red herring) . The topic is not "war" it is "arrest" and there is no cause to change it for one individual.

2.) "We’re not fighting a nation but an ideology,"

No, idealogies cant make bombs and shoot guns. People do

3.) "old rules don’t apply"

The agenda of Big Govt Liberals is to destroy Peoples Rights. Since that is not possible within the restraint of Government by the Constitution, faux arguments have to be sold to people. This summary is predicated on two false arguments before and if People arent aware of the Constitutional limits placed on Govt, they may fall for these slick fables.

The root problem from 1.) is the utter incompetence of Govt to "protect us" or prosecute crime. The system fails repeatedly so in a useless attempt to gain some hold on a criminal, we invent more laws and rules to try to hang on them. The Police failed their PAST legal duty (Miranda was in force when they arrested him) and are attempting to blame someone else for their failure. Since they failed their legal duty, HE'LL GET OFF.

 >>>

"Before deciding major policy issues, why don’t’ the commissioners take a deliberate approach that includes full participation of stakeholders and the public?"

Because they dont want to. Because the People have ignored the process for too many years and paid no heed to Govt working (or not working) and the Corporations, "stakeholders" and others not guaranteed Representation have taken over - theyre called lobbyists and special interest groups.

"Stakeholders" have no say, they are not Citizens.

The question itself is improper, it should be:

"Why dont (whatever representative, County, State, Congress...) determine the will of the PEOPLE, then DO IT.?

They only want feedback when it suits their agendas. Any and all of them.

 ++++++++++++++++++++ 

Another problem for those of you who CAN think. "These people" (the outgrouping fallacy at work- us vs them - divisionary tactic) are NOT TERRORISTS.. Terrorists want to make people afraid. A terrorist puts a fake bomb in front of the Post Ofice.

These people are MILITARY OPERATIVES. They dont want people afraid, THEY WANT THEM DEAD. They use REAL BOMBS.


Posted by Dave at 3:47 PM PDT
Updated: Thursday, 13 May 2010 3:57 PM PDT
Friday, 7 May 2010
LOVE THE LIE - the non event in NYC
Topic: General politics

Bleating sheep, willing accompli in covering up Government incompetence are repeating the chant:

 

"The Police and Govt stopped a bombing in NYC"

 They did not, for two reasons:

1.) No one "stopped" anything, no one knew there was anything in the SUV until IT WAS TOO LATE. It was only detected AFTER smoke came from the vehicle.

2.) THERE WAS NO BOMB. Propane tanks, especially grill tanks, are DESIGNED NOT TO EXPLODE. They are transported in vehicles. Vehicles have accidents and catch fire. Propane tanks are designed to VENT propane (vapor in the case of grill tanks) and thus prevent explosion. There is no way firecrackers and gasoline will cause a tank to explode. 

Watch it happen: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7RNYw11XHM 

Beginning about 1:00 the tank vents and flame shoots out. Eventually after being ENGULFED in flame the tank apparently explodes, although no pieces are visible being blown out. The tank more likely ruptured or the valve came off. The difference is that THIS TANK HAS PLENTY OF AIR AVAILABLE TO BURN. The tank enclosed in an SUV DOES NOT. Propane (any fuel) requires AIR to burn, where does it get it from INSIDE a vehicle? 

See a 250 gallon tank vent (and see the water vapor HELP the combustion...):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwJmw3rtbh0&feature=PlayList&p=D2B590D179EEF79D&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=11 

Then watch this tank deliberately set with fuel underneath. Watch the water ACCELERATE the fire (the flame intensity increases and shuts the camera iris down, the scene goes dark)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3elaqz96GM 

watch the tank vent at 2:00. It cannot explode unless the heat is so great that the propane pressure radically increases beyond the burst strength of the tank, or the escaping vapors contribute to the fire (self heating).  Notice the water doesnt put the fire out in any case. This tank is engulfed in flame, the water spray is accelerating the flame, and it still doesnt explode because ITS DESIGNED NOT TO.

 

The word "bomb" indicates two things  1.) explosion 2.) detonation

The combustion that is the explosion must travel at some minimum wave front speed which, if memory serves, is about 8000 meters/second to qualify as a detonation. Its been some time since I read about this, that figure might be incorrect, but you get the idea.

 This was not a bomb. If the entire vehicle was doused in gasoline and set alight, the tank might explode. Maybe. Worst case, a big fire.

 But, the Wiling Accomplii in the Media have to make the non-incident sound grand and dangerous to support the Govt position that they are in control and protecting us, when they are NOT.

 People in Govt in the "protect us from terrorism" business arent RELEVANT if nothing is happening, and short of deliberately CAUSING a disaster (Waco, for example) by creating a crisis then filling a need, they must blow a non-event like this out of proportion.

Of course, they ALLOWED him on a plane where he could have blown IT up.

Thanks, Jack Booted Janet, I REALLY FEEL SAFE NOW. 


Posted by Dave at 8:44 AM PDT
Monday, 5 April 2010
What the WA Bar is up to- and its no good
Topic: Legal actions

 The front page here has the documents I filed with the WA Bar against Lampson for his hand in making an ILLEGAL and PRE-EMPTED Ordinance. The process is - I file a Grievance with the bar, then the Attorney (Respondant) reponds.

 Lampson didnt respond, he REPLIED with an OFF TOPIC tirade including LIBEL against me- he attempted to paint me (to the Bar, which is IRRELAVENT, Im not responsible to the Bar Assn) as dangerous in that I was at the Council meeting "in a shooting stance wearing shooting glasses"

A shooting stance means firearm in hand ready to shoot. I was not, the witnesses and video tapes will prove hes LYING AGAIN. Since when does Lampson object to INDUSTRIAL SAFETY GLASSES LIKE EVERY HANFORD CONTRACTOR WEARS?

 Lampson, do you also have a personal grudge against people who wear safety devices? Maybe you should make a ridiculous law against SAFETY GLASSES.

  The Bar Rules require the Respondant to respond, he did not, he REPLIED off topic. The Lead Counsel at the WSBA of course followed him off-topic and tried to dump the Grievance, stating that i could request a reconsideration (exact term escapes me at the instant).

 It will go the same, because the ass covering is universal.

T he Grievance I filed contained a precise, itemized statement of actions that were taken, the points of the Courts Rules of Professional Conduct that were violated. All that was IGNORED. There was no reply or response that addressed the itemized complaint.

Of course, we know that when 'they' have nothing to go on, ad-hominem and red-herring are ALWAYS the last resort. 


Posted by Dave at 10:47 AM PDT
Monday, 29 March 2010
Waco II- Storm Troopers arrest militia members in Michigan
Topic: General politics

  Theres been a post on the back burner a-waiting for a current relevant story as an illustration, and thats the one about Jack Booted Janet. Todays media Circus about the  oh so dangerous Militia in Michigan is just the story ive been waiting for. Or not waiting for, or waiting for and hoping to not happen...you get the drift.

 First some inside info on Waco you didn't know, but need to.  Notice the common element in Waco and this incident, the RELIGION link. Thats meaningful.

Michigan story in Detroit paper

Now, bear with me as we go back Memory Lane to BEFORE Waco, to the SETUP.  Its all about an internal battle in the Seventh Day Adventist Church you didnt hear about.

Years ago, there was a massive, more or less anti Roman Catholic religious movement in the early 1800s (see, I told you we were going way back) called the Advent Movement. It resurrected and attempted to expound on (with marginal success) the Protestant Reformers of the Dark Ages and their doctrine that the Church of Rome was the harlot of Revelation. Thats a whole 'nother story we cant get into here because of lack of bandwidth.

  Several religions denominations such as SDA, LDS, Jehovahs Witnesses sprang out of the prophecy movement that attended. The movement fizzled out by roughly 1900 and about the only remainder was theology in the SDA Church, and history books.

   Somewhere after the 1960s, the SDA church began to seriously crumble from within from doctrinal watering-down. The church left its "pillars" as they are called, which refers to fundamental beliefs.

 There was some generalized resistance against this breakdown until it became a movement around 1990 (I don't recall exactly when it happened, and there may not have been an "exactly when" date) known as the "Independent SDA" movement. The Independents returned to the founding beliefs and practices of the Church which were so reformist that they were becoming Judaistic.

 About the same time as the Roman Catholic Church started hemmoraging members from internal struggles, they also started to infiltrate the SDA Church which was more or less the only group still exposing the prophetic identity of the RC as the undesirable entity in Revelations (the book of the Bible. The claim of "infiltrate" is not mine, it was witnessed by Samuele Bacchiocchi, the esteemed SDA Theologian from Andrews University. Sam had pulled a 'fast one' on the RC Church by becoming the only outsider to ever get through their high powered University, and Sam wrote a Thesis on the Sabbath and it was approved by the Church, which they later regretted because it was a modern expose on the fact the Church has invented Sunday worship in place of the ancient (Judaistic) Sabbath. But thats another story.

Sam testified in person in Nevada, Iowa around 2000 that he had caught one of his instructors receiving mailed marching orders on how to teach from Georgetown U. Another story yet. This is just what happened, I'm not preaching here, its just history.

 Anyhoo,  theres a giant split in the SDA Church over/during this time/events and the split is BANKRUPTING the financially incompetent/increasingly insolvent SDA Church who was, at the time, bankrupting its Health System. The Catholics bought much of it and rescued it. Apparently good hospitals both before and after.

  The organized Conference Church HATED the Independent movement which had absolutely no hesitation in calling a spade a spade and tried to shut the Independent movement down. It didn't work.

  Now, the Waco tie in. Contrary to (or maybe in addition to) what the Media told you about Waco, David Koresh and the Branch Davidians WERE NOT KOOKS. I know EXACTLY what they believed, taught and lived, because I saw it in the Independent Movement- they were part of it that wanted to be left alone. I saw some of Koreshs videos, they were lock, stock and barrell Independent SDA. Nothing whacko, just the teachings of the early SDA Church. To the best of my knowledge, they did not participate in the broader movement to expose the Conference Church corruption (I have more than enough religion/SDA knowledge to use the term
"corruption" as an expert) and theres the problem, the CHURCH COULD NOT USE ANYTHING AGAINST THEM- they werent in the fray.

  I got information, from where I don't recall, and I wish I'd chased it further down) that the "info" that led to the assault on Waco came from SDA sources in Australia (theres an unhappy past with SDAs in Australia, another story yet). Shortly after that, one John (lfrom Florida, his ast name escapes me at the moment) warned his employees to keep the TV production vans locked to prevent weapons from being planted in them while they were out videoing Church services.

  There was eventually enough attack against much of the Independent movement that it somewhat fell apart. But not Koresh. Apparently they had their own little thing in TX and weren't bothering anyone. Or the Church had no leverage to attack them with.

   Realize the SDA Conference Church is HEMORRAGING MONEY at this point. Members are walking out and/or not paying Tithes. Were talking millions/billions, not chump change. I saw the Tithe income at an Ohio church TURN OFF LIKE A SPIGOT when they started introducing some nonsense or another for religious teachings.

  Then out of the blue, David Koresh is dangerous and attacked by the Feds with a flame throwing tank. You didnt see that on the TV reports, but I was fortunate to see the raw video feed that the Constitutional Lawyer Linda Thompson (or was it Tomlinson) from Indy, Indy was distributing. It showed the Jack Booted Thugs (the term borrowed from Nazi Germany and applied to the black clad Police SWAT teams members- there was a German imported sort of boot being sold then that was being worn) attacking the compound- with NO ATTACK IN RETURN. There was NO fire from insde the house, in fact, the Davidians had locked themselves in a cellar and burned to death when the Storm Troopers lit the place on fire. It showed a Thug shooting hmself in the right leg with his own gun while ascending a ladder. It showed five (best I recall the number) of JBTs on a roof top, 2 or 3 entered thru a window and the outsiders remaining IMMEDIATELY opened fire thru the wall, obviously killing or injuring those who just entered. It showed the ammo dump on fire/smoldering with JBTS walking near it. (ammo in a fire is not particularly dangerous, I've tried it, an unchambered round has no force) and showed a military tank punching through a wall in the building and when retreating, a flame thrower igniting and setting the building on fire.

Thats what the Media hid from you.

I'd talked with Linda shortly after that and she told me about the black helicopter (in Indy, I assume) that "bombed the wrong house"(attacking her house, so they thought). Thats not Internet lore, she told me that.

  The M.O. is the same here, organized RELIGIOUS group under attack from OVERWHELMING MILITARY FORCE. Does it take such force to apprehend a few gun toting religious folk? Of course, they trot out the MI leaders Ex wife who has an axe to grind against him. WHy didnt they infiltrate the group and take it down from the inside? Why dont they similarly take action agsint ILLEGAL ALIEN FELONS and DRUG DEALERS?

F ollow the money, honey. Theres the history, now watch the show. And watch the "evidence" gleaned from the Internet where any Chinese hacker can plant it. Theyre hacking the Pentagon...Thats what I call a reliable chain of evidence!

 Also watch to see any effect of publicity because the internet is so prolific whereas it was not in the Waco days.

And just take a wild guess as to how many more of these groups are in the Midwest. And notice the only valid complaint besides a possibly made up internet threat is that they were engaging in military style training. 


Posted by Dave at 12:32 PM PDT
Updated: Monday, 29 March 2010 12:36 PM PDT
Wednesday, 24 March 2010
And now - TREASON IN THE WHITE HOUSE
Topic: Constitutional

Dingell admits that Obama Care (insurance reform is NOT health care reform. thats red-herring) is about "controlling the People"

 http://www.breitbart.tv/shocking-audio-rep-dingell-says-obamacare-will-eventually-control-the-people/comment-page-11/#comment-4618061

  And (part of) my letter to Doc Hastings predicting this:

  ----------------

 

1.) While searching for a valid OMB Control Number for the 2010 Census, which I cannot find, I noticed a troubling thing in several Executive Orders (EO’s).

Previous EOs repealed by Klinton contain limitations on Agency authority, with language such as:

Section 1. Definitions. For the purposes of this Order:

(a) "Regulation" or "rule" means an agency statement of general applicability and future effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy or describing the procedure or practice requirements of an agency,...”


and


Sec. 9. Judicial Review. This Order is intended only to improve the internal management of the Federal government, and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers or any person. The determinations made by agencies under Section 4 of this Order, and any Regulatory Impact Analyses for any rule, shall be made part of the whole record of agency action in connection with the rule.”


Direct quotations from EO 12291


Notice a problem, the Executive is attempting to, or in fact, making and interpreting LAW, which are functions reserved to the Legislative and Judicial under the U.S. Constitution.


Klintons EO 12866 changes things- it starts off with a bunch of Un Constitutional philosophy:


The American people deserve a regulatory system that works for them, not against them: a regulatory system that protects and improves their health, safety, environment, and well-being and improves the performance of the economy without imposing unacceptable or unreasonable costs on society; regulatory policies that recognize that the private sector and private markets are the best engine for economic growth; regulatory approaches that respect

the role of State, local, and tribal governments; and regulations that are effective, consistent, sensible, and understandable. We do not have such a regulatory system today.”


We don’t have such a system because we should not have one. The President does not grant well being and performance of the economy...


Section 1. Statement of Regulatory Philosophy and Principles.

(a) The Regulatory Philosophy. Federal agencies should promulgate only such regulations as are required by law, are necessary to interpret the law, or are made necessary by compelling public need, such as material failures

of private markets to protect or improve the health and safety of the public, the environment, or the well-being of the American people.”


and:


Sec. 10. Judicial Review. Nothing in this Executive order shall affect any otherwise available judicial review of agency action. This Executive order is intended only to improve the internal management of the Federal Government and does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity by a party against the United States, its agencies or instrumentalities, its officers or employees, or any other person.“


See how the language has been modified from previous similar EO’s from limits on what regulations may be made, to a ‘suggestion.’ In Sec. 10 of EO 12866, the requirement for Agency documentation requirement has been removed.


There are SERIOUS problems here, it concerns me that OMB is no longer under DoC but directly under the President. Why? Why is the Agency responsible for issuing Control Numbers itself not under the same requirement? Why is the Executive attempting to circumvent the Separation of Powers?


Theres a simple answer - A EXECUTIVE/MILITARY COUP. The Executive is also CIC of the Military. All it takes now is an EO or two to seize Legislative and Judicial authority in Agency rules binding as law, and when we attempt to ignore them, use military force to impose them.

 

--------------------

Administrative rules apply to some Agency, as stated in the EO. NOT TO THE PEOPLE. Only laws that the People authorize via their CONGRESS are valid.

 

The Lead Hour is fast approaching. 

 


Posted by Dave at 10:06 AM PDT
Monday, 15 March 2010
2010 CENSUS FORM IS ILLEGAL
Topic: General politics

I just received the 2010 Census form and as suspected, its illegal. Its in violation of the Paperwork Reduction Act, USC 44:

 http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/paperwork-reduction/3512.html

 The Census are playing games with words, they have attempted to invent some "authorization number" which is an expired 2006 Census OMB Control number with a "-C" added to the end.

 There is no such thing as an OMB Authorization Number. "Authorization" is a process, a "Control Number" is a result.

 The 2010 form has no OMB CONTROL NUMBER.

 There is no vaild OMB Control Number listed as issued by DoC ESA listed on the GSA website:

 http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain

[correction, there is a vaild number, it does not appear on the form, there was an expired 2006 number on the DoC ESA website, I cant find the .pdf at this moment] 

(select Department of Commerce" from the "Select Agency" dropdown box)

The required statement under the PRA that 'no one is required to respond...if no vaild OMB COntrol Number appears' is not  on the form.

Obama has apparently taken control of Census from DoC (it appears under the White House website) but the form claims that Census is under DoC. Which one is it? 

There are multiple addresses to send the form back to, the pre-printed form sends it to Arizona, while the forms instructions say to send forms without a pre-printed envelope to Indiana. Why not AZ for both? 

Notice two other interesting things:

1.) The Decennial census is a Census of ENUMERATION, to count people for apportionment of Representation, NOT TO COUNT WHAT ETHENIC ORIGIN THEY ARE. There is no legal basis for asking about race, religion, age, income... ITS A HEAD COUNT.

Notice the BOX around question # 1 which asks for head count, it sets that question apart from all the others. Its the only one legal

2.) The back of the form states:

"You may E-mail comments to <Paperwork@census.gov>; use "Paperwork Project 0607-0919-C" as the subject."

Thats the number that appears on the front of the form. There is no such thing, who is inventing it and WHY?

Simple. Considering the form is asking info as to how many Hispanics are in the Nation, and the fraud by ACORN in voting, its an attempt to get Hispanic voters to vote DEMOCRAT.

Give me another valid reason?

More false statements:

"The Census must count every person living in the United States on April 1, 2010"

NO, the law does not say "must count by April 1," it says "as of April 1" which means there is 9 months on and after April 1 to count all who WERE population as of April 1. Forms completed and counted BEFORE APRIL 1 ARE ILLEGAL. 

It's simple, find where the Hispanics live, target them with more political advertising.

It's called HOAX AND CHAINS.

 

Next question, if this form is a "-C" revision, then where and what are the zeroth through "-B" revisions and who is getting which one? 

 

 

  

 

 =============== what I just posted to a newsgroup =======

 

 I just received a 2010 Census form. I suspected it would be illegal since Obama took Census over from Dept of Commerce (DoC). Search for the Census Bureau and itll appear under the White House.

The form, and letter that preceeded it, appear to be from Census under DoC. There appear to be TWO Census - question divisions.

Heres a link to the form:

http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/langfiles/2010_Questionnaire_Info_Copy.pdf

USC 44 contains the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) which is Federal Law that requires that any collection of information be cleared thru the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and issued a "valid OMB Control Number" (direct quote) else no one is required to respond to it:
 http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/paperwork-reduction/3512.html

The PRA requires two things:

1.) A valid OMB Control Number
2.) A disclosure to the recipient of the collection (you and me) that we are not required to respond... read the title and notice the EXACT wording.

  Under USC 13, Census law, the 10-year Census is a Census of ENUMERATION, to count Citizens (****not illegal aliens****) for apportionment of Representation (in CONgress):

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode13/usc_sup_01_13.html

There has been false information floated as to what information is required to be given, and penalties for not giving it:

3.)The only info REQUIRED in a Census of Enumeration is HOW MANY at each address, NOT RACE, OR ETHNICITY

4.) The penalty for refusing to answer is a max of $100.00.

Think anyone gonna haul you into Federal Court for $100?

Just the opposite, read on...

The 2010 Census form is divided into two parts: (critical to notice)

5.) Question # 1 in a BOX BY ITSELF

6.) The rest of the questions about race, ethnicity, 'are you Hispanic'

Q #1 is the ONLY one thats required to be answered in a Census of Enumeration.

  At the bottom - left of the form, there is a PHONY statement that PRETENDS to be an OMB Control Number. It is an expired 2006 Census OMB Control Number with a "-C" suffix. It is referred to as an "approval number."

ALL OMB CONTROL NUMBERS ARE EIGHT DIGITS:

"Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), OMB assigns an eight-digit OMB Control Number to each the agency information collection."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/transition_ppwk_reduc..pdf

There is no such thing under Title 44 as an "approval number." "Approval" is a process to ultimately issue a "Control Number." Approval is a process, the Control Number is the result.

Id found, but cant find now, a list of expired OMB Control Numbers on the DoC ESA Website, maybe one of you can stumble across it.

 Notice the phony number appears in the part of the form that asks irrelavent questions, it is separated from the required question about number.

There is a false statement on the form that pretends that the Census must be taken BY APRIL 1st. This is contrary to Census Law which states the Census is taken only between April 1 (of every 10th year) and only for nine - months duration.

=================
I received the form BEFORE it is valid. IT is NOT legal to collect Census information in MARCH. [The Control number is only valid between April 1 and December]
=================

An allegedly valid OMB Control Number appears to have been issued to Census as appears on this web site:

http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain


(select Dept of Commerce from the first drop-down list)

NO OMB CONTROL NUMBER APPEARS ON THE CENSUS WEB SITE, OR ON THE OMB WEBSITE.

  IF there is a "-C" suffix, then this implies that there are at least, possibly more than, FOUR DIFFERENT CENSUS FORMS, such as "Rev 0" (the original with a valid OMB COntrol number) and THREE PHONY VERSIONS or more. If so, those in excess of Rev 0 are illegal.

(Im borrowing "Rev 0" from engineering documentation as an illustration, there is no Rev number on the form)

 One of the questions after Q # 1 asks if the respondant is HISPANIC.

I have contacted our Congressional Rep. twice on this, no response yet. I have contacted a half dozen media outlets, no response. There wont be any.

There is no such thing as a Control Number with an ALPHA SUFFIX.

Look at this site, who are PARTNERS? ACORN. Groups out to count HISPANICS to load the apportionment to the Democrat/Leftist side with Hispanic voters. Especially if they VOTE TWICE:

http://2010.census.gov/partners/


"Partners" are ACTIVISTS out to increase the count of Hispanics, Indians ("other than white") for the OBVIOUS reasons, to get more Democrat votes.

Critical question: If they are legal residents, why bother? Wont they respond and be counted?

It may not be about that, its about, IMO, targeting the AREAS in which they live with political advertising. Illegal, maybe not, deceptive and divisive, underhanded? Absolutely

Do you think theyll prosecute you, an objecting Conservative White (or any other conservative race)? NO. They want to UN COUNT you.


Posted by Dave at 2:15 PM PDT
Updated: Wednesday, 6 October 2010 11:23 AM PDT

Newer | Latest | Older