Program about Panama Canal on PBS
Topic: General politics

 Besides a fascinating program on Government greed at the expense of peoples lives (a separate rant) the story was about the Feds installing a CZAR to run the project, who ran it in a manner of "black peoples lives were insignificant, well kill them off and fire anyone who raises any questions about pay or working conditions."

It was apparently built before the League of nations confab on workers rights in 1919. 

What struck me was attempting to find a parallel between that use of CZAR and OBAMAS USE OF CZARS.

 Watch the program - you decide.

Is this the start?
Topic: Economy, what's left of

Posted under "Economy" although the reasons may not be obvious:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/01/24/authorities-fear-cops-targeted-officers-shot-hours/# 

At a slight risk of credibility, Im gonna say I TOLD YOU SO. 

Go Jesse! Lawsuit against T&A - INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS RANT
Topic: Constitutional

"Ventura filed his lawsuit Monday, January 24, 2011 in Minnesota and news reports have named David Olsen as his lawyer. The former governor has indicated that his suit will include violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 4th Amendment, arguing that he and others with disabilities have been discriminated against and unduly singled out by TSA despite presenting no threat and warranting no reason for lawful search. Further, Ventura has argued that his ability to travel freely has been infringed, hampering his ability to work."

http://www.infowars.com/ventura-strikes-back-with-lawsuit-against-tsa/ 

RIGHTS BELONG TO THE PEOPLE AND THEY ARE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, NOT GROUP RIGHTS.

 Individual rights, Right to freedom from unreasonable search, in this instance. Some VAGUE, INVENTED THREAT is NOT grounds for search of an individual unless cause can be shown that THAT PARTICULAR PERSON is a threat.

Random searches are UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

 Same with the 2A, the Right to Bear Arms is an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT, thus, not subject to the restriction of 'only within the scope of an organized Militia'

 

Straw argument- criminals dont have 2A Rights
Topic: Constitutional

Argument: 

"Criminals have no right to posess firearms" 

 Sounds reasonable, doesnt it? It sounded reasonable to join the JONESTOWN CULT. They all died for their trouble.

I heard Jim Jones on shortwave years ago, it was CLEAR he didnt have A screw loose, they ALL were loose...

Whats wrong with this notion? Whats mainly wrong with it is that its fronted by so called "gun advocates" who didnt learn anything from recent history.

Cases in point:

1.) there was a report on the Polk Co, Florida S.D. website  of an ex con (or current con, dont recall exactly) whose house was broken in by another criminal. Apparently he (the first con) had no way to defend himself. Shouldnt he be exercising HIS UNRESTRICTED RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS? The words SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED HAVE NO QUALIFIERS.

Who needs to protect themselves MORE than ex criminals? Or current criminals? AGAINST OTHER CRIMINALS.

2.) You think its OK to deprive people called "criminals" of their Right to Bear Arms?

OK, YOURE A CRIMINAL, HAND IT OVER.

thats what happened in Castros Cuba, and EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN NEW ORLEANS during KATRINA.

Declare Martial Law, declare ANYONE bearing arms as Criminals.

And thats EXACTLY what many States Laws hold.

 This is the problem with the twin ailments of the Stockholm Syndrome and ingrouping/outgrouping. Look those terms up. 

THIS is terrorism...
Topic: General politics

take a look at THIS:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_russia_airport_blast

Ignore the divisive, subversive, manipulative, fearmongering ranting of the US Government attempting to INVENT a terrorist threat in the US (that doesnt mean that none exists, read carefully).

When you see THIS happening, youll KNOW without a doubt that its 'terrorist time'

One can only cry "wolf" so many times... 

This from Time, for your consideration

 When its "Muslim militants" wreaking havoc in the US, BELIEVE ME, YOULL KNOW IT.

Until then, its the Gubmint carrying out its protection racket to keep itself in a job by making people afraid. 

 If I dont catch a cold, then medicine is not protecting me. If theres no terrorist threat, then Givernment is not protecting us.

I have zero faith in their abilities to do so IF and WHEN it does happen, as self centered, incompetent and ass covering as Gubmint Agencies are. Katrina, anyone? 

 

  

Next time they pull that nonsense...
Topic: Constitutional

"Citizens should only have single shot firearms for hunting"

"Theres no reason a Citizen needs a high capacity firearm"

 Heres the reply:

"State your reason for only allowing Citizens, with the Constitutionally protected Right to Bear Arms, using the Constitutionally protected Right to Free Speech, and further, explain how your position does not constitute either Subversion or Treason against the United States of America.

You only get to use ONE WORD to reply" 

 

URGENT - CONTACT CONGRESS NOW!!!!!!
Topic: General politics
My Email to Doc Hastings on the UN:

http://thehill.com/news-by-subject/foreign-policy/139563-the-world-from-the-hill-un-funding-an-early-target-for-house-republicans


The World from The Hill: U.N. funding an early target for House Republicans
By Bridget Johnson - 01/23/11 05:22 PM ET

A key House Republican is quickly pressing forward with her goals to scale back U.S. funding for the United Nations.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told The Hill that oversight would be a key function of the panel, particularly funding to the U.N. Human Rights Council (HRC) that is "a waste of taxpayer dollars."

"I'd like to make sure that we once and for all kill all U.S. funding for that beast," she said last month. "Because I don't think that it advances U.S. interests, I don't think that that's a pro-democracy group, it's a rogue's gallery, pariah states, they belong there because they don't want to be sanctioned."

----------------

The UN evolved from the League of Nations which was a great idea, but powerless to do anything about its decrees without agreed cooperation.

In the late 1940s, America screwed up badly and joined the UN and WORSE, gave control of its military over to the UN. Marshall was right, but the Senate ignored him, limited invervention WAS the way.

Russia got its nose out of joint and wanted to run the show, and its been down-hill ever since.

Source= declassified docs at the Yale U Avalon Project (on-line archive, fascinating reading)

I for one am SICK and TIRED of hearing of our CITIZENS getting killed in UN CONFLICTS.

GET US OUT OF THE UN!!!!!!!!!

Slippery slope crossed- constitutional problem
Topic: Constitutional

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0vItJqpQ8U

  The "slippery slope" is often (rightly) cast as delusional, in this case, its accurate-

  Here's where the false idea that the Constitution grants rights goes right to hell - when its cast as 'government can assign rights'

  Appears they are... giving rights to one party at the expense of the rights of others IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL.

   There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the US Constitution (or the WA Constitution for that matter) that :

1.) grants rights

2.) grants rights to one group at the expense of others rights

  WHAT DOES THE WORD "CONSTITUTION" MEAN? IT MEANS THE MAKEUP AND FORMATION OF GOVERNMENT - AND THAT GOVT SHALL NOT INFRINGE.

  There's nothing wrong with Target "reassigning" Muslim workers because clear      (and clearly stated, previously evidenced) religious beliefs, its called "reasonable accomodation" and they are required, BY LAW, to do so where it does not cause material harm to the business operation.

  But, thats not the point. Thats PRIVATE. That has no effect on the Customer.

  Where the 'slippery slope' is crossed - the threshold of disaster is reached, is when Government, which is controlled under EEO laws (and employers who are controlled, or are supposed to be under incorporation laws) are forbidden from discriminating based on race, gender, ethnicity...tries to CONTROL CITIZENS WITH IT.

  Where that WENT wrong (not going, but WENT) is when people started accepting such conditions they observe at WORK, as an Employee,  in their lives as Private Citizens, WHERE IT HAS NO HOLD.

  Slippery slope - laws on rentals. Illegal to rent based on ethnic discrimination. Illegal to do business with ones own property with whomever you do or dont want to deal with??

 WHAT HAPPENED TO PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS? 

HERE COMES THE REAMING OF THE CENTURY !!!!!
Topic: Economy, what's left of

HEEEEEERRR IT IS. The economic story ive been waiting for. The setup...

" BOSTON (AP) -- Investors are finally inching back into the stock market. But are they too late?

While millions sought refuge in traditionally stable bonds over the past two years, they missed a more than 90 percent rally in stocks. Suddenly bonds don't look so safe, and some of the $11 trillion that Americans have parked in mutual funds is shifting back to stocks."

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Investors-return-to-US-stocks-apf-2965522050.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=8&asset=&ccode=

 

  For the SCREWING you are about to receive, may you be truly thankful... 

  My previous prediction, Dow 14K-ish. Why 14k? Simple. Individual (and others) investors have hesitated getting in for the risk of another drop. The big guys that ran it up in '07 took it to 12K-ish and dumped it. It pays NOTHING to use their own money to pump it back up, only to dump it, they end up screwing each other over, and that aint how the game works.

 They ALL win when you all get screwed.

  Yes, bonds SUCK big time. Security in lending MONEY TO BANKRUPT ENTITIES???

http://www.cnbc.com/id/41129099 

  Yes, I suppose theres a crap load of cash heading for Wall St and that money - in is JUST WHAT THEY'RE WAITING FOR.

  Pump the Dow up to 14K or so and claim "recovery" just long enough for fools to buy into the scam - AND THEN CRASH IT AGAIN. They now know how much suckers money they can get out of it - 11T.

  Is that worth their time? M'thinks so! Wont be MY money they get! 

 

WA SB5124 - vote early, VOTE OFTEN
Topic: WA Illegal

The WA Legislature, in all their illiteracy, are pushing a "vote often" bill which specifically provides for voting twice, and inventing some connection with the "Help America Vote Act" (PL 107-252) that does not exist with regards to reasons for not being registered.

Read SB5124 at:

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5124&year=2011 

READ THE BILL. DONT take ANYONES word for whats in it, especially in a place like WA State where illiteracy is RAMPANT.

Then look at PL 107-252 at:

http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt

 Here are my notes as a guide:

--------------

in re 5124/2011:

* Sect. 34 (2), p 24 should read "and under the control of the Auditor..."

*in re "voting center", line 8, p. 27 "employer card" is troubling, whats that got to do with a State run voting system? Since when is an employer a LEGAL AUTHORITY? This may allow illegals to vote.

*Sect 43, line 22, should indicate under whose control. Too vague. Secure with the County/State or secure in a box at the nearest auto parts store?

*Sect 47, p. 35, lines 11-14, vague, unenforceable, permits fraud. Who determines, and by what standard is determined that "handwriting is the same?" Someone with handwriting analysis experise or someone OPINION? Not valid. If Voter cannot figure out what his OWN NAME is and how to SIGN IT, he is incompetent. Too much room for fraud here.
 
Sec. 1, p.3, lines 7 and 8 - misleading, false. PL 107-252 does not establish 'reasons why not registered' as falsely indicated in these lines. It refers to simply 'not being registered' (Title III Sec. 302 at http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt ) The Federal Code only related to a missing entry on the voter rolls, NOT ELIGIBILITY FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE TWICE as stated in WA SB5124

"12 (b) There is an indication in the ((poll book that the voter has (13) requested an absentee ballot, but the voter wishes to vote at the (14) polling place)) voter registration system that the voter has already (15) voted in that primary, special election, or general election, but  the (16) voter wishes to vote again;

& read Sec 36, p 27 (12), provides for check against voting twice but what WHEN that CHECK DOESNT HAPPEN???? Is there any MEANINGFUL PENALTY against the resulting VOTE FRAUD?? It wont happen in THIS STATE!!!!

THE FEDERAL LAW SAYS NOTHING ABOUT VOTING TWICE. FEDERAL LAW SIMPLY ESTABLISHES TO VERIFY REGISTRATION.  SOMEONE IS FABRICATING THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Vote early, VOTE OFTEN????????

This bill is is simple, it provides for Mexican voting, undocumented, vote twice, just conveniently FORGET to remove their vote after its cast.. Allow them to vote twice, or be unable to produce ID, vote anyway and promise to catch it later (which wont happen, Sect 36, p. 27 lines 9-12).

Gun case in NJ
Topic: Second-Amendment

Ben says:

This was posted today on Fox news.  Gonna be interesting to see what the Supreme court does.  Even if he wins, he probably won’t see a dime from the state.  They owe me for back taxes they wrongfully collected, and when I ask them to pay, they just laugh.  Apparently the line for reimbursement of any kind is as long as the one in NYC.  Maybe with some high priced attorneys on his side, they might be able to squeeze the state right away.  But then if I was him I wouldn’t step foot in New Jersey again, or he might never see the light of day again if they catch him, for anything.  The boys in Jersey know how to make bodies disappear."

 

Traveling Man's Gun Arrest Appealed to Supreme Court

Published January 18, 2011

| Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Missed flights only inconvenience most people. A late flight landed Utah gun owner Greg Revell in jail for 10 days after he got stranded in New Jersey with an unloaded firearm he had legally checked with his luggage in Salt Lake City.

The Supreme Court could decide Tuesday whether to consider letting Revell sue Port Authority of New York and New Jersey police for arresting him on illegal possession of a firearm in New Jersey and for not returning his gun and ammunition to him for more than three years.

Lower courts have thrown out his lawsuit

Revell was flying from Salt Lake City to Allentown, Pa., on March 31, 2005, with connections in Minneapolis and Newark, N.J. He had checked his Utah-licensed gun and ammunition with his luggage in Salt Lake City and asked airport officials to deliver them both with his luggage in Allentown.

But the flight from Minneapolis to Newark was late, so Revell missed his connection to Allentown. The airline wanted to bus its passengers to Allentown, but Revell realized that his luggage had not made it onto the bus and got off. After finding his luggage had been given a final destination of Newark by mistake, Revell missed the bus. He collected his luggage, including his gun and ammunition, and decided to wait in a nearby hotel with his stuff until the next flight in the morning.

When Revell tried to check in for the morning flight, he again informed the airline officials about his gun and ammunition to have them checked through to Allentown. He was reported to the TSA, and then arrested by Port Authority police for having a gun in New Jersey without a New Jersey license.

He spent 10 days in several different jails before posting bail. Police dropped the charges a few months later. But his gun and ammunition were not returned to him until 2008.

Revell said he should not have been arrested because federal law allows licensed gun owners to take their weapons through any state as long as they are unloaded and not readily accessible to people. He said it was not his fault the airline stranded him in New Jersey by making him miss his flight and routing his luggage to the wrong destination.

Prosecutors said it doesn't matter whose fault it was: Revell was arrested in New Jersey with a readily accessible gun in his possession without a New Jersey license.

Lower courts have sympathized with Revell but refused to let him sue the police.

"We recognize that he had been placed in a difficult situation through no fault of his own," wrote Judge Kent A. Jordan of the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. However, the law "clearly requires the traveler to part ways with his weapon and ammunition during travel; it does not address this type of interrupted journey or what the traveler is to do in this situation."

The case is Revell v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 10-236

 Dave says:

CLASS 1 BULLSHIT ALERT; Read the BOLD above again. If it does not address it, THEN THE LAW HAS NO HOLD ON IT. If the law says "no parking on Sunday" then what about MONDAY??

 Is the law for SPEEDING enforceable against someone PARKED along the road???

Do they think that were all THAT STUPID???? See the AD HOMINEM attack here - see the Spanish Inquisition - falsely accuse hiim then make him prove it, then cover up in the process. Refusing to allow him to sue for FALSE ARREST???

Welcome to COMMUNIST NEW JERSY. 

And now, for the CRITICAL OBSERVATION: Since when does UTAH "LICENSE GUNS" Ive READ UT LAW, I dont recall such thing as "licensing guns"

CONcealed PERMIT, maybe, (with the emphasis on "CON) as grossly UNCONSTITUTIONAL as that prohibition on the Right to Bear Arms is... 

FBI harassing Blogger on the behalf of a SO CALLED TEA PARTY CANDIDATE
Topic: Constitutional

 “This could be a knee-jerk reaction to the Tucson situation,” he said. “If you satisfy them you’re not a threat—they won’t be back.”"

1.) Could have been my ass. "Threats" as seen by a CREDIBLE LEO agency are based on CREDIBLE DATA, not OPINION or CLEAR RETALIATION as it the case here. If there was clear evidence, then go bust said Blogger, if not, leave him alone.

COULD HAVE BEEN IS NOT A VALID LEGAL STANDARD. It "could have been" is vague and subjective. "Could have been based on what evidence that would warrant a warrant?

But that doesnt play into the manipulation and GOVT TERRORISM game. "Terrorism" is not primarily about "killing people" its "making people afraid"

2.) if YOU satisfy them" is how the Spanish Inquisition worked. Make a false claim and make the VICTIM PROVE IT.

"“It’s political payback,” Bowler said after visiting Christian County Sheriff Joey Kyle Jan. 13 apprising him of the FBI investigation."

Say WHAT? Citizen has to go to the local SD to tell them the FEDS ARE IN HIS COUNTY? "The SHERIFF is behind this", is how it looks from here.

The problem is that while the Govt wastes time harassing Citizens, Al Qaida gets to see what a bunch of Keystone Cops they are, learn their methods, weakenesses, learn how to EXPLOIT the system. When it does come time for a REAL Islamic attack, these clowns wont know what to do but start the Clown Car and toot the horn in VAIN.

 Part of this is to stay RELEVANT. There are no credible threats, so they have to INVENT them.

====================

http://ccheadliner.com/news/article_3f8f1968-1f4f-11e0-91a1-001cc4c002e0.html?login_success=true#user-comment-area
 

Local blogger claiming FBI intimidation

Local blogger Clay Bowler said newly-elected 7th District Rep. Billy Long has tried to silence him before. And, after the FBI paid him a visit at his Ozark home Jan. 12, he thinks he’s trying to do it again.

“It’s political payback,” Bowler said after visiting Christian County Sheriff Joey Kyle Jan. 13 apprising him of the FBI investigation.

Bowler writes the Bungalow Bill’s Conservative Wisdom blog and said he’s been critical of Long since his candidacy for Congress. Bowler is also the author of the Long is Wrong blog that’s been gone since Long won the general election in November.

“I’ve poked fun at Billy,” Bowler said. “Part of it was satire—exposing Billy as not being a real Tea Party candidate.”

Bowler said Long even offered him a job on his campaign if he would give up his critical blogging.

Bowler was accompanied to the Sheriff’s Department by Michael Wardell, Nixa, who was also on the Republican primary ticket. Wardell said he just wanted to support his friend in what he believes to be intimidation.

“Clay is a friend,” he said. “This almost smacks of an overreach of power.”

Kyle said he was unaware that an FBI agent, along with Greene County Sheriff Jim Arnott, paid a 30-minute visit to Bowler, but cautioned against an overreaction.

“This could be a knee-jerk reaction to the Tucson situation,” he said. “If you satisfy them you’re not a threat—they won’t be back.”

 

Todays significant news - SHOOTING
Topic: General politics

Seven people hurt in Detroit bus stop shooting

Seven people, at least five of them high-school students, were shot Tuesday at a bus stop in Detroit, Michigan, officials said.

Two of the victims were in critical condition; the others were in serious condition at area hospitals, Police Chief Roderick Grimes said.

"Two perpetrators, possibly three, pulled up in a vehicle, exited their vehicle with weapons, asked for a person by name and then opened fire onto the crowd," he said.

"They got back in their vehicle and exited the scene."

http://articles.cnn.com/2009-06-30/justice/michigan.school.shooting_1_summer-school-cody-high-school-high-school-students?_s=PM:CRIME

 So, why doesnt THIS MAKE NATIONAL NEWS? Why are all the Leftist Hearts Bleeding over the shooting of the Congressman from AZ

[Education moment- she is a "man", man means species. There is no distinction between male an female in the word "man" Thats for you feminists out there who have lost use of proper English]

Why am I not looking at THAT incidence? Because that one was STAGED.

What about the Leftist cry of "THE CHILDREN..." This was a SCHOOL SHOOTING, there are two more than in the incident in AZ?

 Other significant news:

14 people BRUTALLY MURDERED IN MEXICO- their heads cut off their bodies. Rampant border crime, drugs, murder, NONE of that was seen fit by the Radical Left media to make headlines. 

 Why, you ask? Isnt the traitorous cry for "gun control" a factor in all the above?

Yes, but thats not the central question. Theres a much larger game going on, and "gun control" is just another card in the deck.  Here is the Ace of Spades:

   I should have written here the presumption that the Radical Left will wait till the Rs take over to turn the Nation to crap. Theyll accelerate the economic collapse, or simply, suddenly admit how bad it is and precipitate a down turn. Theyll do any rotten thing to have something to blame on conservatives.

 Like stage a shooting in AZ. MUCH TOO CONVENIENT. Another CONgressman just CONVENIENTLY waiting with proposed, treasonous, anti gun legislation IMMEDIATELY after they just read the CONSTITUTION which FORBIDS IT. 

 Whats the lives of a couple people in their lust for totalitarian control? Whats throwing some school children under the bus (pardon the pun) in Detroit to suit their agenda? NOTHING.

OR, WHAT A BETTER PLOY TO GET THEM TO THROW THEMSELVES UNDER THE BUS. THINK ABOUT THAT CAREFULLY! Untraceable. Almost.. 

Whats really sick about these people is that they have no problem seizing upon, manipulating others tragedies to suit their political aims.

 Its a game called "school yard bully." Weve all seen it at school, shook our heads in amazement when the Teacher or Principal TOOK SIDES WITH THE BULLY. Bully goes around threatening people and when one of them stands their ground, the Principal sides with the AGRESSOR, DESIPITE THE FACT HE IS KNOWN FOR IT.

  There are several points of sick and twisted psychology at play:

1 .) Manipulation. Two kinds, re-read the statement above about seizing on others tragedies, plus this- the manipulator always tries to persuade others to join their cause. Im trying to persuade you to join my cause, but MINE happens to be RESTORATION OF THE US CONSTITUTION. Theirs is DESTROYING IT for the sake of their own power.

Little Sally gets in a spat with Suzy and wants retaliation, wants more force behind her cause, so she goes a-lying to Mary and Betty saying that "Suzy said something bad about them" Mary and Betty had nothing in it, and are being manipulated with a lie to take sides, where no sides exist. 

  Manipulation. Obamas attempt to invoke this as a National tragedy. It ISNT. Its an AZ matter. She is an AZ Congressman. The President (Kennedy) was a National tragedy because a.) he was a good man b.) the President is 'of the United States' as a whole.

2 .) 'good cop, bad cop' of a sorts. The Principal (Govt) wants improper and absolute power. When there are no problems, they have to INVENT them to have occasion to assert their supposed authority. Nothing is happeneing at the School, no one is afraid of the Principal (or the Principal has no one to lord his authority over on a power trip). The Principal cant stir up a ruckus without calling attention to himself as being at fault or getting fired, so he employs the BULLY to do it FOR HIM.

  Enter the Bully. The Pricipal not only KNOWS what the Bully is up to, but approves of it, because of the ingroup-outgroup thing - three groups- Principal (supposed authority figure), bully (de-facto, I think, is the proper term, acting in fact, but improperly). The Principal is a TERRORIST in using the Bully (crime, drugs, Illegal Mexicans, Islamic threat, real or not (actualized or not), gun control, false arrest, illegal wiretapping) to commit acts of agression against the Students without being caught, and its a perfect play because the Principal is also in charge of discipline in the School and is free to let the Bully off.

  Until a Parent speaks up, then they attack the Parent, but the Bully has no hold. A College tried that crap with me (me personally, they thought Id fall for the submissive frightened Student crap) and I stuck my foot about a yard up their asses and told the State AG where to jump. They thought I'd play along with their corrupt games until I reminded them I WAS A CITIZEN WHO OWNED THEM. They learned who they had no hold over. It wasnt Grade school, and me with cash in hand for Tuition was in charge, and in charge of hiring and firing them...

   If a Student dares speak up, or kicks the Bully in the nuts, the Principal comes down on him full of mock rage and demonizes and punishes him for SELF DEFENSE. Can't have an Honest Student interfering with the racket, can we?

  So, why not Detroit news, but shooting of an authority figure? The shootings in Detroit are HOW THEY WANT THE GAME TO GO, no sense in blowing their cover on that one or, put another way, no point in risking pissing more people off by attempts at gun control legislation over that incident. They have to either INVENT one or WAIT TILL ONE HAPPENS and seize on it to FURTHER THEIR AGENDA.

  The City and School allowing a shooting to ocurr is EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT, the Bully assists the Principal in a power grab. They keep that one quiet, THE SCAM IS WORKING.

B U T--- when someone breaks up their game, does something non-linear like the shooting in AZ, their cover is blown and they have no option but to play trump, and out they trot with their PREPACKAGED GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION.

 Now the bully (Govt allowing violent crime, especially through gun control laws which are PROVEN TO INCREASE CRIME- a SELF FULFILLING PROPHECY) is not so much neutralized, but another Bully who doesnt answe to the Principal is in charge, and he captures the national media, who are nothign but a bunch of whores lusting after trash to print to make money. Govt cant have anyone breaking in on their game of media complicity, so they have to divert the matter into gun control.

It's TREASONOUS to do so...

  Its the same game as in the Arab/Israeli "conflict". The UN establishes the Land of Israel ( strange manipulation, "giving" them THEIR OWN LAND) and then employs PLO and Hamas as bullies to rain down on Sderot and blow up bus stops (that came to me from an eye witness, thats not internet legend) THEN TAKE SIDES WITH A MURDEROUS BULLY.

    End game, the UN hates Israel and is looking for an excuse to un-do the land grant. 

  But when Israel is attacked, and takes a DEFENSIVE action, the UN demonizes Israel. The game is to ignore the root cause (Hamas shooting rockets on Monday) and focusing on Israel bombing a rocket position in Gaza on Friday as the start of the incident, thus making up Israel as the agressor. 

  
 

Now playing in Europe-- coming here soon!
Topic: Economy, what's left of

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Adam-Smith-Institute-Blog/2011/0102/European-nations-begin-seizing-private-pensions 

Not that Id give CSM the time of day... 

And todays load of FECES from Obamas mouth: 

President Obama challenged congressional Republicans to embrace the "shared responsibility" of governance even as the White House appears ready to use unilateral executive powers" 

The President DOES NOT HAVE POWER. The President has RESPONSIBILITY. CONgress MAKES the laws, the President CARRIES THEM OUT. Its not a back and forth, shared thing. The CONgress has the authority to over-ride a Presidential veto. 

Read the US CONSTITUTION and underline any passage that gives the president "power" 

how to tell a Liberal is LYING
Topic: Constitutional

Abercrombie is LYING. Know how I can tell? When a LIBERAL has nothing substantive to go on, but has an AGENDA to push, they ALWAYS resort to AD HOMINEM ATTACKS.

 Notice he doesnt say "lets clear the record" - he ATTACKS everyone else who is questioning the CONSTITUTIONALITY of Obamas election.

But, he has to attack others and LIE about them, claiming they have a politcal agenda. But what HES DOING IS NOT  A POLITICAL AGENDA?

And apparently hes going to ignore his own States LAWS in his agenda? 

Add HYPOCRISY to the charged.

Listen CAREFULLY to Manning:

http://atlahmedianetwork.org/?p=12043